Agenda 2030 is set to take the subjugation of Africa to previously unimagined heights, with the rest of the Third World to follow shortly thereafter.
“I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race…If there be a God, I think that what he would like me to do is paint as much of the map of Africa British Red as possible.”
-Cecil J. Rhodes
While the true scope and depravity held in store for Africa at COP21 won’t be known to us until later this year, at least one nation, Ghana, has submitted its draft budget to the United Nations in advance of the Conference. The projected cost figure, if accurate, would be the next in a long chain of abuses against Ghana by Globalist entities like the IMF and multinational corporations alike.
Ghana finds itself precariously situated between the geopolitical aims of two power factions on the “2D Chessboard” in the form of the Anglo-American Establishment and China. American colonization of Ghana by corporate entities and NGOs, draping themselves in the facade of benevolence, have a consistent track-record of introducing eugenic experiments in the region, often masked as philanthropy; “feeding the hungry” and “healing the sick” are the constant clarion calls of these wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Monsanto is one such example. Long known by alternative media readers as the developers of deadly GMO frankenfoods like Golden Rice, Africa is a favorite dumping ground for “beta testing” these biotechnologies. Perhaps because of the Power Elite’s intense hatred for the world’s “non-white peoples,” perhaps as a gambit to blanket the continent in patented seeds, thereby owning the land itself, Monsanto’s insidious activity in Africa has not left Ghana unscathed.
Earlier this year, Ghana was the target of a new set of draconian G7 regulations set to outlaw seed sharing. Known colloquially as the “Monsanto Law,” the bill is endemic of Agenda 21’s planned control of land use and agriculture.
“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.“
-Bill Gates on depopulating the Third World
As previously mentioned, the Anglo-American Establishment is not the only group with imperialistic aims in Ghana, as China’s underground network of mines blanketing the nation, most notably those satiating her voracious appetite for gold, have brought hellish working conditions for Ghana’s native populace:
It is upon this backdrop – one of Ghana being tossed about like a rag doll in the world of international power politics – that the Neomalthusian “sustainable development” requirements of Agenda 2030 come to the small African nation. Care to guess how much this Tehnocratic revamp of Ghana will cost?
A whopping $22.6 BILLION, a grotesquely overvalued figure which the United Nations knows perfectly well Ghana will never be able to afford, as even the globalist World Bank admits the funds required would drain a significant percentage of Ghana’s entire GDP:
58.5% of Ghana’s GDP, to be precise. As other Third World nations begin to update their proposals ahead of COP21, expect similar quotes on the debt burden these already impoverished nations will be required to shoulder.
It remains to be seen what the character of the public-private partnership mentioned above will be in Ghana, but the resource-rich, salary-deprived nation has a plethora of options. American biotech firms? Chinese infrastructure companies? A hefty loan from the IMF, or the BRICS New Development Bank, perchance?
“All of the above” is perhaps the greatest threat to Ghana – and, unfortunately, the most likely outcome if proponents of global governance have their way:
As the alternative media as a whole seems poised to eternally sing the praises of the Russian Federation in stymieing the Anglo-American Establishment’s imperialistic aims in Syria, entrenched in analysis of the 2D Chessboard of geopolitics, this author’s contrarian nature has seen fit to call attention to the 3D Chessboard unifying these seemingly disparate nation-states.
Today’s game? Agenda 21. Its playing piece of choice? The seemingly autonomous nation of Russia.
To those still invested in the “BRICS Saviour” paradigm, Russia’s compliance with United Nations Agenda 21 and the collective tyranny accompanying it may come as a shock; to the student of Deep Politics, it’s merely forensic history.
From Agenda 1920 to Agenda 21
Long before the advent of the modern digital dictatorship prescribed by Agenda 21, the dream of Smart Cities was alive and well in the consciousness of burgeoning Technocrats – perhaps most notably, in the early Twentieth Century, in the USSR. Taking cues from American developments like Technocracy, Inc. and the ruthless efficiency of the assembly line, the Cybernetic central planners of Bolshevism attempted what, to them, seemed a natural synthesis: A seamless integration between the social engineering of the State and the mechanical/electrical engineering of the Industrial Era.
“Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country.”
Lenin’s call for the electrification of the Proletariat, when made in 1920, seemed benevolent enough; the elimination of ignorance and poverty and the liberation of peasants from a subsistence agricultural life certainly don’t strike one as overtly laying the seeds for totalitarianism. Yet whatever Lenin’s original intent for the USSR’s electrification and the “New Soviet Man” it was poised to create, his death in 1924 saw the end of his management of this vision.
The gambit for the creation of this “New Soviet Man,” like the Nietzschean “Superman” before it and the transhuman of today, was instead implemented by Josef Stalin. Utilizing a curious coalition of Bolshevik elites, anti-Bolshevik Tsarist “bourgeois engineers,” and American industrialists, the now infamous “public-private partnership,” so indivorcible from Agenda 21, was born.
“The electrification plan was unlike any before in history. It wasn’t just about building power stations. Its aim was to construct a new type of human being.”
-Vitalii Semyonovich Lelchuk, USSR Academy of Sciences
One of the more widely known examples of these Soviet “Smart Cities,” Magnitogorsk, was in fact a direct copy of Gary, Indiana. Structured around a centrally managed steel mill, the city’s master plan was even drafted by the same American Technocrats who originally built Gary. Many American engineers, inspired by Gary’s Cybernetic faculties, went so far as to emigrate to the USSR to offer their expertise to the project:
Eerily foreshadowing the predicament faced by Free Humanity in the midst of Agenda 21, little of Magnitogorsk’s post-1937 history is known to us, as it became a closed city – the very type of strictly managed urban use envisioned by the ruling caste of today.
Lesser known than the American emulation that was Magnitogorsk, the documented collaboration between the supposedly “anti-Capitalist” Bolsheviks and the Ford Motor Company in the city of Nizhni-Novgorod (also known as Gorki) is laden with Deep Political implications. Originally uncovered by Hoover Institute researcher Professor Antony C. Sutton in his 1986 publication, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, the Gorki-Ford joint venture yielded not only prolific automobile production, but Soviet military equipment as well.
“In May 1929 the Soviets signed an agreement with the Ford Motor Company of Detroit. The Soviets agreed to purchase $13 million worth of automobiles and parts and Ford agreed to give technical assistance until 1938 to construct an integrated automobile-manufacturing plant at Nizhni-Novgorod. Construction was completed in 1933 by the Austin Company for production of the Ford Model-A passenger car and light truck. Today this plant is known as Gorki. With its original equipment supplemented by imports and domestic copies of imported equipment, Gorki produces the GAZ range of automobiles, trucks, and military vehicles. All Soviet vehicles with the model prefix GAZ (Gorki Avtomobilnyi Zavod) are from Gorki, and models with prefixes UAX, OdAZ, and PAZ are made from Gorki components.”
These Ford/Gorki cars and trucks populated not only the streets of Warsaw Pact nations, but also its battlefields; the aforementioned model numbers identified by Sutton, produced from 1930 through to the present, are often modified for military use as armored trucks and mobile missile platforms. Much to the confusion of American soldiers in Vietnam and Korea, taken aback that Communist armored trucks bore a striking resemblance to their own, these infantrymen were unknowingly treated to a rare glimpse behind the curtain of the Anglo-American Empire’s proverbial sausage factory: The Military-Industrial Complex and its terrifying global scope, knowing no ideological bounds but the aspiration of Power.
The GAZ-66, a Gorki-produced, Ford-engineered armored transport vehicle, still in service today
Ford, like General Motors, propagates Smart Car development in China – via WSJ
…not only in China, but Russia as well. Leveraging Russia’s longstanding ingenuity in space and rocketry technology, Ford has partnered with St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University to create a truly global, self-driving “snitch car” network – by linking every automobile the world over via satellite.
A graphic representation of digital serfdom – “Neofeudalism for Babies”
Of this particular “public-private partnership,” Safe Car News reports:
While much has changed on the 2D chessboard of geopolitics since the era of Stalinist “Five Year Plans,” the increasingly interconnected 3D supranational game has remained a static field for nearly a Century – clearly exemplified by the longstanding desire of both international companies like Ford and regional powers such as Russia for the Technocratic subjugation of human populations the world over.
No “Good Guys,” no “Bad Guys,” just Globalists and those who refuse to be collectivized.
As in China, Russia’s UN-compliant Smart Cities are, in part, financed by corporations heavily affiliated with the Trilateral Commission. Kazan Smart City, Russia’s analogue to China’s Tianjin Eco-City, is the same Technocratic dystopia represented by Agenda 21 projects the world over.
The boundless and global tentacles of Agenda 21 have slipped over the “impenetrable” BRICS wall into each and every “anti-Hegemon” nation, with Smart City startup capital from the Trilateral Commission in tow. Kazan joins the deleterious coalition of Kashiwa no-ha in Japan, Songdo in South Korea, the aforementioned Tianjin Eco-City, and numerous others subsumed by the Trilateralist vision of Zbignew Brzezinski’s “technetronic era.”
Even the mighty Bear of the East is not immune.
Kazan’s Trilateral connection comes by way of its “public-private partnership” with German multinational giant Allianz, whose American subsidiary, PIMCO, is infamous for hiring former Fed chairmen as Senior Economic advisers – most recently, Ben Bernanke.
Allianz as it appears in Kazan Smart City’s “Partners” brochure
As the Trilateral Commission’s official rosters dating back to at least 2011 demonstrate, Allianz has consistently placed Trilaterals in key positions within its corporate hierarchy:
Some of whom have some rather interesting affiliations themselves:
Unfortunately, Kazan isn’t even the most egregious example of “sustainable development” within Russia’s borders; that honor goes to Skolkovo Innovation Center, a planned Smart City to be erected outside of Moscow.
Artist rendering of Skolkovo
Dubbed as “Russia’s Silicon Valley” by its proponents, Skolkovo’s envisioned Technofeudal design will be all too familiar to Agenda 21 researchers – a “sustainable” city run by a coalition of “experts” and machines, with individuals subordinate to the Cybernetic collective:
What makes Skolkovo particularly noteworthy, however, is not its cookie-cutter UN-mandated design, nor its wholehearted approval by the Kremlin, but the unique public-private partnerships underlying its development. The project is a venerable smorgasbord of Military-Industrial Complex firms, cybersecurity companies, and multinational corporations – most of whom are heavily associated with (you guessed it) the Trilateral Commission.
The list of “Key Partners” on Skolkovo’s website (archived here for posterity) are too many to note: Boeing, Cisco, DOW, Airbus, General Electric, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Samsung, Siemens – the list goes on. The insidiousness and scope of the aforementioned companies’ involvement in unsavory affairs as varied as Smart Cities, war profiteering, precrime AI, eugenics, and economic Globalization, too, are far beyond the scope of this article.
Skolkovo’s Trilateralist connections, though, simply cannot be overlooked:
GENERAL ELECTRIC (GE):
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES (IBM):
Anglo-American vision, Trilateral Commission cash, and Russian collectivist engineering – what could possibly go wrong? Surely, Reader, you’re already planning your trip; just remember, those with combustion engine-based transportation need not apply!
“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”
It may be difficult for one to separate the ongoing conflict between the Anglo-American Establishment and Moscow in the realm of geopolitics, particularly as a fierce proxy war between the two over the Leviathan gas field’s planned transit line to Europe rages on in Syria; but the contrast between this 2D chessboard and the multilateral, multipolar 3D chess match cannot be more stark.
The Kremlin, echoing the People’s Bank of China, have called for an end to the Dollar as world reserve currency to be replaced not by the Yuan, Ruble, or gold, but the IMF’s Special Drawing Right:
Russia, like China and every other UN member state to date, has taken the “sustainable” bait – knowingly or unknowingly, she has set herself on the path of resurrecting the dream of the USSR’s “planned cities” of olde, ignoring the nightmare they actually came to represent. Like the Soviet power elite of the 20th Century, Russia’s modern power elite have turned to Anglo-American financiers and Globalist Machiavellian schemers in fulfilling this mandate, even as bullets fly in Syria and Ukraine.
From Magnitogorsk to Kazan, from Gorki to Skolkovo, the vision of Technocracy lives on. So, too, do the Globalist entities positioned to pick up the pieces after an engineered conflict between East and West.
My advice to you, Reader? Don’t surrender your autonomy by picking sides, relegating your fate to that of a mere playing piece.