Tag Archives: BRICS

The Future of America and Gold Standards, a Reader’s Perspective and My Response

In my recent post asking for audience feedback (in which I received a lot of valuable commentary – thank you), I received a series of comments from a fellow Truth-seeker named Peter. He shares a unique perspective from his experiences in Europe during the collapse of the USSR, which I’d recommend reading:

Comment #1
Comment #2

My response to Peter is a long one and includes a few perspectives I’ve yet to share in the form of proper articles, so I re-present them here in the hopes you might find them valuable. I’m also in the process of working on an entry about a recent Chatham House policy paper on the unfolding of multipolar World Order in 2016, so stay tuned for that as well.

My Response

I appreciate your unique perspective on this issue, especially as it pertains to alt-media programming of Americans vs. Europeans. I wonder how much of this is, as you suggest, a managed perception or merely a difference in culture, as the “prepping/survivalist” mentality of Americans has existed (in its modern form) since at least the age of the Cold War; in America, for example, there were/are no massive public works programs like bomb shelters or food stores as there were in the Soviet Union – Americans were urged to do this of their own accord. “Prepping” as opposed to “being prepared for.” That’s not to say I discount the possibility of some sort of “second American (color) Revolution,” as the breaking down of large nation-states to be (re)federalized under a new system would certainly weaken their ability to participate in this new “World Federalism.” The rest of the world has experienced hard times in a manner that America hasn’t in nearly 100 years, so we’re certainly overdue. As you say, only time will tell.

Of course, I wasn’t around to experience the dissolution of the USSR, but from what you’re saying there was a sense of relative affluence before the detonation of the country. There is no such affluence in America anymore. There is virtually no manufacturing, no jobs for the youth outside of the service sector, and those higher-paying jobs typically require a healthy dose of University brainwashing, which of course means indebtedness. In short, there’s little left to rob. In my brief time on this planet, I’ve watched this country go from a form of opulence to severe wealth dislocation; there are pockets of the country where reinvestment in infrastructure is strong, but many more that look like parts of the Third World. For example, if you were to ask a citizen of Detroit or Cleveland when the “economic collapse” is coming, they’d say it already came and went, and in the context of those cities they’d be right. And this is of course without mentioning the severe deterioration of physical and mental health, as most Americans have been poisoned (GMOs) without their realizing it over the past 20 years.

As I see it, there are three primary differences between the breakdown of Soviet satellite states and some hypothetical breakdown of the “United” States (though these are by no means the only differences).

  1. Americans are heavily armed and it’s hard to imagine a managed uprising in this country that doesn’t include significant bloodshed or resistance; much easier to control and direct a mob with Molotov cocktails and clubs than one with guns, which (in my opinion) is one of the main reasons Americans are being “slow-killed” by poisoning of water and food and “slow-robbed” via economic booms and busts as opposed to some overnight sea-change.
  2. Unlike the USSR, which had infrastructure to plunder by the West, American companies are no longer “American.” They’re sufficiently globalized and their wealth diffused enough to leave this country behind without thinking twice, as they already have in the post-GATT/Uruguay Round world. The TPP will only accelerate this. It’s a similar process to the looting of the USSR, but it’s being done in slow-motion and has only accelerated since 2008.
  3. We’re entering an era unlike any other we’ve seen in history with the rise of low-level algorithmic AI, robotics, and automation, and thus, I think it very difficult to extrapolate from history any clear picture of the future from where we stand today. For once, the phrase “this time it’s different” may ring true. For example, what is the future of Imperialism if you no longer need human soldiers to occupy a country (or at least significantly less humans) and use robots in their place? What is the future of “sweat shop Capitalism” if all manufacturing is completely automated? In this regard I have far more questions than answers.

As for the notion that there is some secret Chinese elite working on behalf of Free Humanity as in your linked article, I find this to be ridiculous wishful thinking if not overt disinformation. American corporations and capital built modern China. Anglo-American wealth managers, through the LBMA, have fixed metals prices and managed the wealth transfer from West to East since Day One. The BRICS concept was the brainchild of Goldman Sachs, and the PBOC itself are readily integrating themselves into the IMF’s SDR system. As such, I think the “Global Monetary Reset” your linked article mentions will include elements of a commodity/currency basket, but I’d be hard-pressed to call this a positive development.

 

Zimbabwe is indeed a resource-rich nation, though I would caution the idea that the IMF’s interests in Zimbabwe are fundamentally any different than China’s. Take, for example, Mongolia, which has been pumped dry of all her material wealth by the Chinese for decades now. The average Mongolian should have pockets overflowing with gold, but instead that wealth has ended up in the coffers of the PBOC. I see no reason why, in the long run, African nations will not be treated the same way.

There’s much more to say on this topic, but I would also caution your notion that a “Gold Standard” is in any way “better” than fiat standards in terms of control of populations. In fact, I’d say in many ways it’s worse. I’ve considered dedicating an entire article to this concept and may do so in the future, but I’d recommend a reading of Eustace Mullins’ original work on the Federal Reserve.

Unlike most of the researchers who followed in Mullins’ footsteps, he starts the history of monetary debauchery in America not with the creation of the Fed, but 50 years before, recounting the managed monetary crises of 1873, 1893, and 1907. Needless to say, the devastation they wrought couldn’t have been brought about without a Gold Standard. The monetary pendulum swings throughout history from “sound money” to “fiat money,” but the power behind the proverbial curtain never actually changes.

“He who owns the Gold makes the Rules.”

I’d also note that I’m not an atheist, merely an “anti-religionist.” I believe in “God” and have experienced significant evidence for this concept, but not in the manner of a “Bearded Man in the Sky” that’s outside of (and apart from) myself. But that’s a topic for another day!

I truly do value your personal experiences on these issues, Peter, and thank you for taking the time to respond.

GUEST POST: Let’s Cut the Crap, Vladimir Putin is Helping to Usher in the Globalist NWO

A very thought-provoking and thoroughly-sourced article by Ken of RedefiningGod. It’s a long read, but if you’re a regular here at Stateless Homesteading, this shouldn’t dissuade you!

On the morning the Turks downed the Russian airliner, I stumbled across this article from notorious disinformation mill Veterans Today…

vtputin

It is such a good example of East/West dialectic propaganda and the “Putin as Savior” con that I decided it would be a good teaching tool for helping people to get real. And given all the confusing narratives that swirl around Putin and the current world situation, I think the best approach is to focus on two fundamental, telling things…

1) Putin’s cooperation in the globalists’ 9/11 operation, and

2) Putin’s promotion of the globalists’ UN as the solution to our current woes.

So let’s get started…

PUTIN AND 9/11

Even if one looks at Vladimir Putin from a naive, conventional perspective, he is a former KGB officer and is therefore fully familiar with the concept of false-flag terror. This being the case, it would not have escaped his attention that on the day of the 9/11 attacks, three New York high-rises fell after only two were hit by aircraft. So as an intelligence professional, he would have known that something was fishy on the very first day. And in the days following the attacks, Russian intelligence merged with holes in the US government’s official story would have made the inconsistencies quite glaring. This raises an obvious question…

Why did he spend the next 14 years playing along with the 9/11 “Official Story”?

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, Putin stuck to the globalist talking points…
911puttalk
…From the BBC. Raw (untranslated) video of Putin making his remark on Bin Laden can be found here
putbinyou

And here are some key excerpts from the BBC article along with my comments…

>>> No proof needed

Mr Putin, who is in Brussels for meetings with European Union and Nato leaders, told reporters: “For us it is already clear. The only thing we do not know is the exact role he (Bin Laden) played (in the terror attacks on America). <<<

So Putin joined the globalist minion chorus in blaming the 9/11 attacks on Osama Bin Laden. This being so, could it be that Russian intelligence was unaware of Bin Laden’s close relationship with the CIA? Given that Bin Laden was a key figure in Russia’s war in Afghanistan, you can be sure they knew all about his CIA ties. And this means that Putin was attributing 9/11 to someone he knew was a CIA asset. For any reasonable person, this strongly suggests the possibility that the attacks were a false-flag operation conducted by the CIA, but Putin said nary a word about that, did he?

>>> The Russian president criticised Saudi Arabia for refusing to let the US launch attacks against Afghanistan from bases on its territory. <<<

So in addition to blaming the 9/11 attacks on Bin Laden, Putin was a cheerleader for the US attack on Afghanistan. One wonders if he was compensated for his support by being given the Russian distribution rights for Afghan opium.

>>> BBC Europe correspondent Justin Webb says President Putin is likely to try to persuade EU leaders that they, in turn, must be more willing to accept that Russia needs the freedom to take what actions it deems necessary in its ongoing battle against rebels in Chechnya. <<<

And this section brings us to Putin, Russian intelligence, and their own false-flag attacks against the Russian people. The Russian government are no strangers to the art of statecraft, and they too have used 9/11-style attacks to launch military action in places like Chechnya. See the Russian Apartment Bombings and the Beslan School Massacre for examples of their operations.

Getting back to Bin Laden and Afghanistan for a moment, have a look at this section of his Wikipedia bio…

Bin Laden met and built relations with Hamid Gul, who was a three-star general in the Pakistani army and head of the ISI agency. Although the United States provided the money and weapons, the training of militant groups was entirely done by the Pakistani Armed Forces and the ISI.”

So Bin Laden was connected to Hamid Gul, and can you guess who sat on the Editorial Board of Directors of Veterans Today until he died this past August?…
vtgul
…from Veterans Today

CIA to Bin Laden to Hamid Gul to Veterans Today — interesting connections, no? Truth be told, these high-level intelligence agents all work for the same people (the people who control all the money, the globalist central banksters) and they all know each other, which is why Putin’s support of the “blame Bin Laden” meme is all the more ridiculous. And if you are unfamiliar with what a rat’s nest of spooks and fraudsters Veterans Today is, have look at…

1) VT’s Chairman, Gordon Duff: Shady as Hell: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 1 – The Amazing Gordon Duff)
2) Gordon Duff’s company, Adamus Defense Group: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 3 – Gordon Duff’s “Adamus Group”)
3) VT’s Advisor, Leo Wanta: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 2 – Deconstructing the Bizarre Tale of Leo Wanta)

These guys are heavily involved in selling the East/West dialectic and the “savior” Putin to alternative news readers, which is why they put out garbage like the article featured at the top of this entry.

Now back to Putin…

Lest you think that Putin’s playing along with the Official Story was just BBC’s spin of his words, here are some things straight from the Kremlin website:

> Putin and Bush together pressed “all countries” to join the war on “terrorism” after 9/11…
911putkrem3
…From Kremlin.ru

> In the following month, November 2001, Putin visited the US and talked about Afghanistan during a speech at Rice University…
911putkrem2
…From Kremlin.ru. So even by the Kremlin’s own words, he was supporting the US invasion of Afghanistan and calling Bush’s stance “well grounded.” Yep, that’s a real truth-teller for ya.

> From there, Putin went on to visit Ground Zero in New York…
putin911
…From Kremlin.ru. If you read the article, you’ll see that he played it totally straight: he laid a wreath and expressed sorrow and solidarity over the “terrorist attack.”

> And Putin also sat for an interview with National Public Radio…
911putnpr
…From Kremlin.ru

I located the transcript of that interview on NPR.org. Here are two key excerpts…

>>> Question 17:

Mr. Siegel: President Bush now speaks of Osama bin Laden as “the evil one.” He uses the word “evil.” Is he also exaggerating now, and is it also a slogan for the day, or do you think that’s true?

President Putin: Actually, I think President Bush is being very mild in his choice of words. I have other definitions and epithets to offer, but I, of course, am being restrained by the fact that I am talking to the media and this is hardly appropriate.

The thing is that the people that you have just referred to, terrorists, especially terrorists who base themselves on man-hating fundamentalist ideas, these people, these terrorists, don’t really treat the rest of humanity as human beings. We are not even enemies, as far as they’re concerned. We’re just dust. We’re nothing and we’re a bunch of nobodies. And as people, these criminals deserve the most serious of attention and the most rigorous of treatment. <<<

So when questioned on Bin Laden, Putin expressed no reservations; he backed up President Bush’s narrative with gusto.

>>> From the Question 18 answer:

President Putin: …And I’m not afraid to say that openly, and I can tell you why, because exactly two years ago Russia was the first to come across the kind of terrorism that the Americans had to deal with on Sept. 11. And, of course, the scale was not as large but it was just as horrendous, where, in downtown Moscow and in other cities of the Russian Federation, residential buildings, apartment buildings, were exploded. And as a result of those acts of terror, hundreds of completely innocent people died. <<<

This passage reveals why Putin didn’t blow the whistle on Bush and 9/11. It’s because both he and Bush are globalist agents, and both he and Bush had conducted 9/11-style false-flags on their own people in order to advance the globalist agenda, both domestically (by tightening control over their people) and internationally (by drawing nations into multilateral efforts to fight “terrorism”).

Putin hasn’t told the truth about 9/11 because it simply isn’t time yet. The globalists had much to do after 9/11 to get us to where we are today, and now that they’re about ready to spring the Good Cop beats Bad Cop con, you’ll finally hear Putin speak the truth (some time between now and September of 2016).

[Part 2 – 27-28 November 2015]

PUTIN AND THE UNITED NATIONS

During Putin’s post-9/11 US tour in November of 2001, he also made a notable stop at the United Nations…
911putun
…From Kremlin.ru. Have a look at what the Russian article said about it…

>>> Mr Putin, in his turn, actively supported United Nations efforts against international terrorism, and stressed the necessity for all countries to comply with the resolutions and decisions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly. Mr Annan thanked Russia for its vanguard role in the UN’s fight against terrorism.

They also had a detailed discussion about the political settlement in Afghanistan and measures to prevent the country from turning into a hotbed of international terrorism. Mr Putin and Mr Annan agreed that decision-making on the future of Afghanistan was mainly up to Afghans with active assistance from the international community. <<<

So as you can see, both Putin and Annan were in with Bush on casting 9/11 as a real “international terrorist” attack and on “liberating” Afghanistan so it would stop being a “hotbed of international terrorism” (and start being a plantation for international opium production). But why, you ask? Because in order to bring the peoples of the world under UN/NWO control, the globalists must create global problems that require global solutions. One of the global problems they have purposefully manufactured is “international terrorism”; another is “manmade” climate change, and you’ll hear much more about this one in 3 short days…
cop21
Source

Besides Putin’s trip to the US, another very notable thing happened in November of 2001:the public was introduced to the “BRIC” concept. And it was done by none other than our good friends at Goldman Sachs
oneillbricsfull
…Here is a little about the paper’s author, Jim O’Neill, from Wikipedia

>>> Terence James “Jim” O’Neill, Baron O’Neill of Gatley (born 17 March 1957), retiring chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, is a British economist best known for coining BRIC, the acronym that stands for Brazil, Russia, India, and China—the four rapidly developing countries that have come to symbolise the shift in global economic power away from the developed G7 economies

He joined Goldman Sachs in 1997 and he was appointed as the head of global economics research in 2001, which is also when he published the seminal BRIC paper…

On 28 May 2015 he was created a Life Peer as Baron O’Neill of Gatley, of Gatley in the County of Greater Manchester. <<<

Isn’t it interesting that Goldman Sachs’ Head of Global Economics Research (and a darling of the London Establishment), “Baron O’Neill of Gatley,” was the one who started the BRICS movement? And from that point on, the globalists began to slowly divide the G20 into “shirts and skins” in order to run the East/West dialectic. The G7 shirts would be given the role of the bad guys, and the G5 skins (the BRICS) would be given the role of the good guys. Since the public have been raised from childhood on good guy vs. bad guy stories, letting the “good guys” bring in the NWO would be a nice, easy way to win the public over to the new system.

The slow transition from the post-9/11 love-in to the current-day East/West dialectic conflict began a year after “Baron” O’Neill unveiled the BRIC concept. As the globalists moved the US towards the invasion of Iraq, Putin took the public stance of opposing “unilateral” action…
iraqputuni
…From CBS News

As you can see, Putin was calling for compliance with the UN from both Iraq (in its weapons programs) and the US (in sticking to the UN’s multilateral approach instead of taking unilateral action). Making unilateral action by nation-states look bad while making multilateral actions within the globalist UN framework look good is a core element of globalist propaganda. Neutering the nation-state and empowering the global central government is what globalism is all about, and that’s what “good guy” Putin is selling. As the CBS article goes on to say…

>>> Putin said Russia agrees with United States that it is important to “make sure that Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction in its possession.” But he added that “we do believe that we have to stay within the framework of the work being carried out within the United Nations.” <<<

Now if we step back for a moment and ponder all this, we see that there are two globalist agendas in play at the end of 2002: 1) the war on terror agenda and 2) the dialectic conflict agenda. In the war on terror agenda, the globalists were using the US to forcefully restructure the Middle East through invasions and color revolutions. And in the dialectic conflict agenda, they were building a counterbalance (the BRICS) to the US’ “increasingly insane unilateral actions.”

Putin’s support for both of these agendas was demonstrated after the Iraq invasion took place in 2003. Have a look at this article from 2004…
put2agenda
…From CNN

Reading this article, one might ask him/her self, “If the Russians were really opposed to the Iraq War, why would Putin reveal ‘intelligence’ that supports the position of those who started the War?” The answer is simple: because he was supporting both globalist agendas…

> As the article states, the Iraq War was facing domestic criticism, so Putin said what was needed to help fend off opposition to the war on terror agenda. Since the globalists still had several years worth of work to do in the Middle East, Putin had to help keep the operation on track.

> At the same time, he had to keep up the public stance of opposing the war so the dialectic conflict agenda could continue to develop. At the time the CNN article was written, there was still two years to go until the BRIC nations held their first unofficial meeting at the UN.

So by talking opposition from one side of his mouth and providing support from the other side of his mouth, Putin followed the globalist plan to a T.

A few years later, the East/West dialectic began to take material form. Here is something from the Kremlin website on “Cooperation within BRIC”…

>>> Political dialogue within the BRIC format began in New York in September 2006, when their foreign ministers conferred during the 61st UN General Assembly. Since then, the BRIC foreign ministers have met four times, including at a full-scale meeting in Yekaterinburg on May 16, 2008. The joint statement adopted as a result of the latter meeting formulated common approaches to crucial issues on the international agenda. <<<

So it was in the womb of the United Nations that Baron O’Neill’s BRIC spermatozoon found its target, and the BRIC alliance was born there nearly five years later. A full-scale meeting was held three years after that, which gave rise to a statement on their joint agenda in May of 2008. Before we examine that statement, though, we must have a look at what Putin said at the Munich Conference on Security Policy in February of 2007.

At the Conference, Putin unveiled the “world order dialectic” that we have become so familiar with over the past several years. This is from the transcript of his speech (which can also be watched on YouTube)

>>> what is happening in today’s world – and we just started to discuss this – is a tentative to introduce precisely this concept into international affairs, the concept of a unipolar world.

And with which results?

Unilateral and frequently illegitimate actions have not resolved any problems. Moreover, they have caused new human tragedies and created new centres of tension. Judge for yourselves: wars as well as local and regional conflicts have not diminished. Mr Teltschik mentioned this very gently. And no less people perish in these conflicts – even more are dying than before. Significantly more, significantly more!

Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force – military force – in international relations, force that is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.As a result we do not have sufficient strength to find a comprehensive solution to any one of these conflicts. Finding a political settlement also becomes impossible.

We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?

[In these paragraphs, Putin introduces the PROBLEM: a United States that is running wild in the world trying to impose a unilateral order. He also expresses the collective REACTION (“This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?”). Watch now as he promotes the SOLUTION: the BRIC alliance, multipolarity, and the UN…]

The combined GDP measured in purchasing power parity of countries such as India and China is already greater than that of the United States. And a similar calculation with the GDP of the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – surpasses the cumulative GDP of the EU. And according to experts this gap will only increase in the future.

There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centres of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity.

In connection with this the role of multilateral diplomacy is significantly increasing…

I am convinced that the only mechanism that can make decisions about using military force as a last resort is the Charter of the United Nations. And in connection with this, either I did not understand what our colleague, the Italian Defence Minister, just said or what he said was inexact. In any case, I understood that the use of force can only be legitimate when the decision is taken by NATO, the EU, or the UN. If he really does think so, then we have different points of view. Or I didn’t hear correctly. The use of force can only be considered legitimate if the decision is sanctioned by the UN. And we do not need to substitute NATO or the EU for the UN. When the UN will truly unite the forces of the international community and can really react to events in various countries, when we will leave behind this disdain for international law, then the situation will be able to change. <<<

So there you have it. The globalists are using the United States to do all the dirty work in restructuring the world for the UN-centered NWO, and they are laying all the blame for the damage on the US nation-state, not themselves or their UN. At the same time, they are building up the BRICS as heroes who will save the world from the “rampaging American unipower” by bringing about a STRONGER UN which “will truly unite the forces of the international community and can really react to events in various countries.”

As you can see, Putin is all about bringing in a United Nations that is able to dominate the nation-states of the world, including the US. And this is reflected also in the joint statement from the first full-scale BRIC meeting. If you read through the statement, you’ll realize very quickly that it’s all about the UN. Allow me to take you on a tour of the key points…

> According to the BRIC alliance, what kind of world order should we have?…

“The Ministers reiterated that today’s world order should be based on the rule of international laws and the strengthening of multilateralism with the United Nations playing the central role.”

  • One with the globalists’ UN playing the central role.

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do you make the UN stronger like Putin suggested at Munich?…

“They reaffirmed the need for a comprehensive reform of the UN with a view to making it more efficient so that it can deal with the current global challenges more effectively. The Ministers of Russia and China reiterated that their countries attach importance to the status of India and Brazil in international affairs, and understand and support India’s and Brazil’s aspirations to play a greater role in the United Nations.”

  • Translation: “Reform it by giving the rest of the BRIC nations permanent seats on the UNSecurity Council.”

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do we solve the world’s economic malaise?…

“The Ministers noted that sustainable development of global economy in the long-term as well as finding solutions to the acute global problems of our time, such as poverty, hunger and diseases are only possible if due account is taken of the interests of all nations and within a just global economic system…

The Ministers spoke in favour of intensifying the dialogue to achieve the internationally agreed development goals, primarily the Millennium Development Goals, on the basis of global partnership for development. They supported international efforts to combat hunger and poverty.”

  • By conforming to the UN’s Sustainable Development rules and reaching the UN’s Millennium Development Goals of course.

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do you end the scourge of terrorism?…

“The Ministers unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, committed for whatever purposes. They reiterated that terrorism constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security and that the international community should take necessary steps to enhance cooperation to prevent and combat terrorism. They particularly highlighted the importance of the UN cooperation framework and the need for all member states to implement international conventions of the United Nations and UN Security Council resolutions on fighting terrorism.

The Ministers emphasized the importance of the implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in all its aspects and expressed their opinion that all member states should make concerted efforts towards expeditious finalization of a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism at the UN.

  • So we end globalist organized and funded terrorism by fully complying with the globalistUN’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy. Why didn’t I think of that?!

> According to the BRIC alliance, is manmade climate change for real?…

“The Ministers spoke in favour of strengthening international cooperation to address climate changein the context of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. They expressed their desire to work closely together in order to carry out the Bali Action Plan.”

  • Yep, it’s real, and everyone needs to follow the UN plan to mitigate it.

It was after this joint BRIC statement was released that the Kremlin posted the “Cooperation within BRIC” statement, and the latter contains a passage that we also need to see…

“BRIC is a loose group of countries including Brazil, Russia, India and China, the largest economic growth and political influence centres among emerging economies. These countries have a substantial integration potential in their respective regions.

So what do the Russians mean by “substantial integration potential in their respective regions”? They are talking about a BRIC role in helping integrate the world’s nations into the United Nations Development Regions…
ungroupings

Take a moment to think about the continents of the world:

In North America, the globalists have the US to lead the UN integration effort;
in Western Europe, they have the EU to lead the integration.

Now let’s add the BRICS…

In Eurasia (the middle part of the Europe/Asia landmass), they have Russia to lead the integration;
in Asia, they have China and India to lead the integration;
in South America, they have Brazil to lead the integration;
in Africa, they have South Africa to lead the integration.

Can you see how the BRIC alliance helps pull the developing world into the UN’s regional system?

With all this laid before us, we see that Putin and his BRICS alliance are helping bring in a New World Order centered on a region-based United Nations. And in doing this, they are stopping the evil plans of the Western globalists, right?

Wrong.

The Western globalists’ plan for the New World Order has always called for it to be UN-centered and region-based. They published the blueprint for it back in 1961, and here are some excerpts from pages 35 and 26 (please pardon my crooked scanning)…
pfa35
nwovision26
UNNWO35

Can you guess from which book these excerpts were taken? It was this one…
prospectforamerica
…And it was the result of a Rockefeller-funded initiative called the Special Studies Project.

Can you guess who was the director of the Project? It was Vladimir Putin’s personal friend, Henry Kissinger…
kissputfriends
…From the New York Times

So Putin is helping implement the NWO his pal Henry Kissinger helped design back in 1956…
kissputie
…To learn more about this subject, read The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words…

Now that I’ve shown you what Putin and the BRICS are up to — using their own verifiable words — it’s time to state the obvious…

PUTIN’S CULT OF PERSONALITY AND THE BRICS ALLIANCE
ARE BOTH GLOBALIST FRONTS
PURPOSE-BUILT TO DRAW THE WORLD INTO THE NEW WORLD ORDER
BY CONVINCING THE PEOPLE THE EVIL WESTERN GLOBALISTS HAVE BEEN STOPPED
AND THE IMPERIALIST POWERS HAVE BEEN DEFEATED.

If this reality causes you to lose your false hope, good. False hope must be released in order to grasp on to true hope. And false solutions must be rejected in order to make way for real solutions.

[Part 3 – 29 November 2015]

VETERANS TODAY AND DIALECTIC PROPAGANDA

Now that we’ve explored what Putin and the BRICS are really about, it’s time to turn our attention back to the laughably absurd Veterans Today article that inspired this essay. As we look upon it, let’s make some observations, address some key points, and find a reason for hope.

POINT 1 — The first thing of note is the author, Preston James, who describes himself as aSocial Psychologist with “numerous” intel contacts.
prestonsp

If you wanted to mindfu*k a person – change his or her thoughts, feelings, and behaviors using social stimuli conveyed through mass media – whom would you employ? Why, a social psychologist of course. The controlled mainstream and alternative media are all staffed by such professional mindfu*kers. Their bios will show a background in psychology, intelligence, think tanks, and/or military psywar. Just have a look at who else sits on the Veterans Today Editorial Board of Directors
khrus

It’s important to realize that when you read Veterans Today, you are subjecting yourself to psywar. Their job is to mindfu*k you into accepting both the East/West geopolitical dialectic and the Christ/Antichrist spiritual dialectic.

POINT 2 — Take note of the fearful imagery…
horsemen
…and fearful words they use in the article…

>>> And these “most evil criminals in history” fully realize that in order to take over the whole World they will eventually need to establish their own centralized massive military forces and secret police power.

Most normal folks would define such crimes against humanity as raw tyranny and psychopathy beyond imagination.

And that is exactly what the system is that these Globalists are trying to engender, Worldwide Tyranny and their own 24/7 surveillance system coordinated together to produce what is best described as a virtual boot in the face of all humanity 24 hours a day, seven days a week withno end ever. [“with no end ever”: this sounds like hell, doesn’t it, and hell is the same concept they use to scare you in the Christ/Antichrist dialectic] <<<

Fear is a very powerful force within the human psyche, and it is the mind-killer. If they can keep you in fear and present you with a simple good guys vs. bad guys fairy tale that requires no thought, they are doing your thinking for you. You can no longer afford to allow that. Here is something I previously wrote about their use of fear in the East/West dialectic…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>> 1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?

> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).

> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) is where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap. <<<END EXCERPT

As you read the Veterans Today article, note how it serves to scare people away from the West and towards Putin (and the stronger UN he will bring in). Can you see how the rampaging Western horsemen in the picture would scare rabbits towards the BRICS trap?

POINT 3 — Take note of the references to BABYLON and LUCIFER in the article. This is part of the Christ/Antichrist spiritual dialectic the globalists are also trying to sell the awakening public. If you look at some of the author’s previous work on the “Secret Space War”…
jamesaliens
…you’ll begin to see that the…

“bad unilateral NWO” vs. “good multilateral NWO” conflict
is supposedly part of a larger
“bad aliens” vs. “good aliens” conflict.

Before you write the guy off as a nutter, though, it’s important to note that it was none other than the Rockefellers who launched the UFO Disclosure Movement (see Why are the Rockefellers and the Jesuits guiding the UFO Disclosure Movement?), and the Vatican has been talking about aliens as well (see The Vatican is preparing to introduce the Anunnaki to us). As insane as it all might sound, this ET stuff actually appears to be a real part of their agenda. And if you read the article, you get a basic idea of the two sides they are presenting to the public:

The “Bad Aliens” – “…subterranean Reptoids who are luciferians, evil to the core and allegedly working very hard to set up a Globalist NWO system using the ‘mystery Babylon religion’…”

The “Good Aliens” – “the so-called actual invading aliens from outer space in the final battle will turn out to be God’s army against the aliens (Dracos or Reptoids) which come up from underground to fight at the battle of Armageddon.”

So the Antichrist side is the US, the West, and the Luciferian lizards, and the Christ side is Russia, the BRICS, and the angel army from outer space. Sounds like an Ed Wood movie…
edwood
…does it not? But the globalists might actually try to put on such a show. If you are interested in delving into this particular rabbit hole, I recommend you read Obama and the 2nd Coming. It’s a good primer on what to expect.

And now we find a reason for real hope…

Point 4 – Note that the article attempts to address the growing awareness of Putin’s dialectic role…

>>> The Russian Federation under President Putin’s leadership seems to be a major exception to this apparent Worldwide Globalist control matrix.

Some fear Russia is just playing an assigned dialectical role and not really against the NWO System that these Globalists are trying to shove in place. <<<

The fact that they even mentioned this tells us the War of the Narrative is turning against them. If their “Putin as hero” fairy tale were holding up, they would make no mention of the dialectic out of fear of drawing attention to it. They brought it up because they had to bring it up — they had to do something to combat it.

They even went so far as to slightly distance themselves from Putin in an effort to feign reasonability and open-mindedness…

>>> Until President Putin releases all this Intel to the Russian Mass Media and to the Alternative Media on the Internet, we must reserve judgment as to his true motives despite how promising they now appear. <<<

Of course, this distancing is just for show. They have always been tireless promoters of Putin’s cult of personality…
putfeargod
…(Link)

The article also offers a way for Putin to prove he’s really a hero and not a dialectic roleplayer…

>>> Now is the time for Putin and the Russian Federation to clearly show it true hand if it is legitimate in its fight against the Globalists by doing a big public Intel dump. <<<

Given that Putin’s good guy role in the dialectic is to…

1) block the West (like he’s doing in Syria),
2) EXPOSE the West (like he did with the Turks), and
3) ultimately defeat the West,

…what the article suggests is essentially this…

“Please, Mr. Putin, prove you’re not a dialectic roleplayer by doing exactly what the dialectic calls for you to do.”

How ridiculous is that?

And therein lies our hope: they are losing control of the narrative. This might seem like a small thing right now, but the complications this unleashes on the globalists will grow over time.

Love always…

[Addendum 1 – 29 November 2015]

PUTIN VS. THE WEST AT THE CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT

With the Paris Climate Change Summit just hours away, it’s time to look back to the G20 Summit that happened earlier this month. Here is an excerpt from Update 87

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

[Addendum 10 – 16 November 2015] – East versus West on Climate Change

According to a Bloomberg Business article titled As Terrorism Unites G-20, Climate ChangeExposes Divisions

>>> The divide at the G-20 initially emerged over whether countries will back a more “differentiated” approach, where developed nations carry an extra burden, or “shared” emissions responsibilities, which would require developing nations to make bigger cuts, according to officials who asked not to be named…

The BRICS nations called for a greater focus on emissions pledges to be “differentiated” based upon national circumstances, suggesting they favor industrialized nations doing more to limit emissions than developing ones. <<<

This last paragraph is in keeping with Putin’s reported skepticism on manmade climate change:Putin Believes Global Warming ‘Is A Fraud To Restrain Developing Nations’. So this argument over “differentiated” measures versus “shared” measures might end up being the reason cited for Putin’s potential blocking of a climate deal at the upcoming summit.

In addendum 3 of this update I asked, “What kind of show will they put on, a cooperative love-in or a breakdown between West and East?” Looking at the back-and-forth over Syria and Climate Change, it appears that this G20 Summit is being used to demonstrate the (phony) conflict between the West and East. Should the BRICS be seen as frustrating the West on both Syria and Climate Change, it will set the stage for more provocative actions by the “insane West.”

<<<END EXCERPT

Given the recent shoot-down of the Russian warplane in Syria, we can expect Putin to put on a big show of being tough on the West in the climate negotiations. This will likely result in one of two outcomes:

1) The BRICS will force the West to accept “differentiated” carbon-cutting responsibilities in order to get a deal.

2) A unanimous deal will not be reached, and Putin will be cast as the one who blocked it.

Either way, the globalist script will probably call for the evil West to punish Putin, so be on the lookout for “terrorist attacks” in Russia at some point after the Summit ends (and probably before the end of the year).

Global Banks Carve Up the World Ahead of COP21

As individuals and Nations alike wait in anticipation for COP21 a month from now, described as the United Nations’ “legally binding and universal” update to the ever-deleterious Agenda 21, banksters at the supranational level have shown little hesitation in offering their seemingly sage opinions on how their usurious reserves will be put to use in enacting this “Global Sustainable New Deal.”

From veterans of monetary Technocracy like the IMF and World Bank to the “New Kids on the Trading Bloc” represented by the BRICS and AIIB, monetary institutions around the world are poised to receive their slice of the sustainable pie – at the expense of what little freedom and financial security the individual still retains.

Leading the charge on the Western front is none other than the Bank for International Settlements, the “central bank of central banks” as identified by Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley in his magnum opus Tragedy and Hope. Echoing the credo of “sustainable developers” at the UN and World Bank, the BIS has seen fit to reinforce the meme that the problem of climate change cannot be tackled without complete digital serfdom in the form of an electronic, biometric global I.D.

Euphemistically entitled the “Identification for Development” (or ID4D) program by the World Bank, it represents their “unique” interpretation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; a reading that’s as draconian as it is creative. The UN, World Bank, and BIS are calling for nothing short of a completely pervasive global surveillance grid to be implemented by no later than 2030, all under the auspices of “saving the planet.” ict_id4dconference

Of course, the BIS is also resolute in declaring the World Bank’s “important role” in fighting the phantom foe of climate change – not only in implementing the Technocratic ID4D program, but assembling the cast of private financiers to accompany the torrent of supranational capital:

Some of these “larger private sources of capital” have also positioned themselves in advance of COP21, one example being the marriage of Eastern and Western financial juggernauts in the solar energy market. This was witnessed recently in the merger between China’s solar giant Shunfeng with American-based Suniva – owned in part by the Warburgs (Warburg-Pincus) and Goldman Sachs. These private banking elites and families of antiquity, investing in the petrol-free, carbon-capped future described as a “historic opportunity” by the International Monetary Fund, will doubtlessly be underwriting much of the “green infrastructure” loans called for by COP21.

Screenshot from 2015-08-14 14:02:47

But it’s not just Chinese solar tycoons assembling the capital and infrastructure for humanity’s (Soylent) green future; the recently birthed multilateral giants of the East, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and BRICS NDB (New Development Bank), are also all aboard the sustainable train to globalized Nirvana. In accordance with the United Nations’ assertion that the BRICS NDB is a “dream coming true” for the financing of UN-mandated sustainable development projects in developing economies, the BRICS saw fit to reinforce this notion at the first official meeting of the BRICS Environment Ministers earlier this year.

Don’t take my word for it, or the UN’s, for that matter – the BRICS are crystal clear in their position on Agenda 21:

We  reaffirm our commitment to implement the Rio Declaration, Agenda 21, the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation (JPOI), and the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference in our respective countries, and through our cooperation within the framework of BRICS in accordance with the Rio principles, including the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

We acknowledge the progress made on the Millennium Development Goals in the preceding two decades and reaffirm our commitment towards accelerated implementation of the unfinished task. In this context, we look forward to the adoption of ambitious, transformative and equitable Post-2015 development agenda with Sustainable Development Goals at its core.”

BRICS Statement from the First Official Meeting of BRICS Environment Ministers in Moscow, April 22nd, 2015

These disconcerting official remarks by the BRICS on Agenda 21 stand in stark contrast with recent prognostications by Vladimir Putin to the contrary; this seeming conflict between actual policy and mere rhetoric, designed to seed cognitive dissonance within the minds of the public, is a clear example of a unique brand of propaganda developed in Russia by one Vladislav Surkov.

The alternative media, not immune to the effects of this “non-linear media warfare,” spread the story of Putin’s seeming “climate skepticism” to the Ends of the Earth without so much as a whisper about the Kremlin’s documented support of Agenda 21 as exemplified by the BRICS Summit in Moscow this April.

Put simply, the BRICS cannot simultaneously be against Agenda 21 and adherents to it.

Not to be overshadowed by the NDB, the “lean, clean, and green” (their words, not mine) AIIB are also happy to play their part in financing the latest iteration of Rio ’92. In addition to their publicly stated desire to work with the World Bank and Anglo-American controlled Asian Development Bank, some think-tanks believe the AIIB will be key in financing Pan-Asian energy infrastructure, chiefly natural gas:

In a recent paper by Grenatec, aptly titled “COP21/AIIB and the New World Order,” it is emphatically stated in no uncertain terms that the answer to  the woes posed in Al Gore’s 2006 “scare-you-shitless docu-drama” for the Far East is none other than elite bankers lining the pockets of multinational gas companies. How convenient. Those in the West needn’t worry about being left out of this Eastern development “Renaissance,” though, as the People’s Bank of China is intent on financing city-to-city Agenda 21-compliant high speed rail projects throughout the (People’s) Republic of California.

While it may be a relatively new phenomenon for Americans to be on the receiving end of the digital Panopticon and usurious infrastructure projects, the high-tech beneficiaries of Western capital in the East have long been acclimated to the world envisioned by COP21. Those living under the riches (and dictatorial autocracy) of nations like China and Singapore have had 3G phones in their pockets since the turn of the Millennium. Tracking (and taxing) of automobile usage via GPS by the State has been around just as long, as have electronic ID.

If this was the Singapore of nearly 15 years ago, it’s doubtless that the implements of COP21 like the ID4D program will be welcomed with open arms:

Looking at the success of projects like the joint Chinese-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City, the East is already making a smooth transition to Eco-Serfdom; this cashless, microchipped, carbon-credited “Wonderland” is, after all, virtually indistinguishable from the society in the video above… from 2002.

Using the centuries old threat of ecological disaster, the central planners of COP21 are resolved in holding the globe hostage; their insistence being that one cannot have the freedoms, conveniences, and benefits provided by technology without binding them by an eco-friendly Surveillance State. The infrastructure for such bewildering “green” snitch technologies, to be financed by the supranational banks of the multipolar World Order, will be solidified at COP21 this December. The Paris conference represents the most realistic opportunity for achieving the foundation of this Technocratic World Order since the failure of Copenhagen in 2009, a setback the elite would rather not see repeated.

Unfortunately, there is little we can do to stop the ink from drying on this Neomalthusian treaty, and increasingly less international impetus to do so.

Now more than ever, Free Humanity must work towards perhaps the only tactic capable of subverting the lamentations of COP21: The development of a counter-economy as vigilant and decentralized as the “Globalized Economy” is rigid and exclusive.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider a small donation! -Rusticus
Bitcoin: 1MecdGKVEP6oVpQW11sKgTFBtNKUnu1Dse
DASH: XvBWCtU9wnBVYjNusP33jUf7y1uF9EqJsJ 

 

Russia 21: Agenda 21, Technocracy, and the New World Order in the Russian Federation

As the alternative media as a whole seems poised to eternally sing the praises of the Russian Federation in stymieing the Anglo-American Establishment’s imperialistic aims in Syria, entrenched in analysis of the 2D Chessboard of geopolitics, this author’s contrarian nature has seen fit to call attention to the 3D Chessboard unifying these seemingly disparate nation-states.

Today’s game? Agenda 21. Its playing piece of choice? The seemingly autonomous nation of Russia.

To those still invested in the “BRICS Saviour” paradigm, Russia’s compliance with United Nations Agenda 21 and the collective tyranny accompanying it may come as a shock; to the student of Deep Politics, it’s merely forensic history.

From Agenda 1920 to Agenda 21

Long before the advent of the modern digital dictatorship prescribed by Agenda 21, the dream of Smart Cities was alive and well in the consciousness of burgeoning Technocrats  – perhaps most notably, in the early Twentieth Century, in the USSR. Taking cues from American developments like Technocracy, Inc. and the ruthless efficiency of the assembly line, the Cybernetic central planners of Bolshevism attempted what, to them, seemed a natural synthesis: A seamless integration between the social engineering of the State and the mechanical/electrical engineering of the Industrial Era.

“Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country.”

-Vladimir Lenin

Lenin’s call for the electrification of the Proletariat, when made in 1920, seemed benevolent enough; the elimination of ignorance and poverty and the liberation of peasants from a subsistence agricultural life certainly don’t strike one as overtly laying the seeds for totalitarianism. Yet whatever Lenin’s original intent for the USSR’s electrification and the “New Soviet Man” it was poised to create, his death in 1924 saw the end of his management of this vision.

The gambit for the creation of this “New Soviet Man,” like the Nietzschean “Superman” before it and the transhuman of today, was instead implemented by Josef Stalin. Utilizing a curious coalition of Bolshevik elites, anti-Bolshevik Tsarist “bourgeois engineers,” and American industrialists, the now infamous “public-private partnership,” so indivorcible from Agenda 21, was born.

“The electrification plan was unlike any before in history. It wasn’t just about building power stations. Its aim was to construct a new type of human being.

-Vitalii Semyonovich Lelchuk, USSR Academy of Sciences

One of the more widely known examples of these Soviet “Smart Cities,” Magnitogorsk, was in fact a direct copy of Gary, Indiana. Structured around a centrally managed steel mill, the city’s master plan was even drafted by the same American Technocrats who originally built Gary. Many American engineers, inspired by Gary’s Cybernetic faculties, went so far as to emigrate to the USSR to offer their expertise to the project:

Eerily foreshadowing the predicament faced by Free Humanity in the midst of Agenda 21, little of Magnitogorsk’s post-1937 history is known to us, as it became a closed city – the very type of strictly managed urban use envisioned by the ruling caste of today.

Lesser known than the American emulation that was Magnitogorsk, the documented collaboration between the supposedly “anti-Capitalist” Bolsheviks and the Ford Motor Company in the city of Nizhni-Novgorod (also known as Gorki) is laden with Deep Political implications. Originally uncovered by Hoover Institute researcher Professor Antony C. Sutton in his 1986 publication, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, the Gorki-Ford joint venture yielded not only prolific automobile production, but Soviet military equipment as well.

In May 1929 the Soviets signed an agreement with the Ford Motor Company of Detroit. The Soviets agreed to purchase $13 million worth of automobiles and parts and Ford agreed to give technical assistance until 1938 to construct an integrated automobile-manufacturing plant at Nizhni-Novgorod. Construction was completed in 1933 by the Austin Company for production of the Ford Model-A passenger car and light truck. Today this plant is known as Gorki. With its original equipment supplemented by imports and domestic copies of imported equipment, Gorki produces the GAZ range of automobiles, trucks, and military vehicles. All Soviet vehicles with the model prefix GAZ (Gorki Avtomobilnyi Zavod) are from Gorki, and models with prefixes UAX, OdAZ, and PAZ are made from Gorki components.

-Prof. Antony C. Sutton, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy

These Ford/Gorki cars and trucks populated not only the streets of Warsaw Pact nations, but also its battlefields; the aforementioned model numbers identified by Sutton, produced from 1930 through to the present, are often modified for military use as armored trucks and mobile missile platforms. Much to the confusion of American soldiers in Vietnam and Korea, taken aback that Communist armored trucks bore a striking resemblance to their own, these infantrymen were unknowingly treated to a rare glimpse behind the curtain of the Anglo-American Empire’s proverbial sausage factory: The Military-Industrial Complex and its terrifying global scope, knowing no ideological bounds but the aspiration of Power.

The GAZ-66, a Gorki-produced, Ford-engineered armored transport vehicle, still in service today.

The GAZ-66, a Gorki-produced, Ford-engineered armored transport vehicle, still in service today

As previously demonstrated in my article enumerating General Motors’ support to both the Nazis of yesteryear and the eco-Fascists of today in the form of Chinese smart cities, American automotive companies have a long and storied history of “greasing the wheels” for Globalist projects; in this respect, Ford does not disappoint, as the BRICS have welcomed Ford and the “Smart Car” concept with open arms…

Ford, like General Motors, propagates Smart Car development in China - via WSJ

Ford, like General Motors, propagates Smart Car development in China – via WSJ

…not only in China, but Russia as well. Leveraging Russia’s longstanding ingenuity in space and rocketry technology, Ford has partnered with St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University to create a truly global, self-driving “snitch car” network – by linking every automobile the world over via satellite.

A graphic representation of digital serfdom - "Neofeudalism for Babies"

A graphic representation of digital serfdom – “Neofeudalism for Babies”

Of this particular “public-private partnership,” Safe Car News reports:
fordsafecar1fordsafecar2

While much has changed on the 2D chessboard of geopolitics since the era of Stalinist “Five Year Plans,” the increasingly interconnected 3D supranational game has remained a static field for nearly a Century – clearly exemplified by the longstanding desire of both international companies like Ford and regional powers such as Russia for the Technocratic subjugation of human populations the world over.

No “Good Guys,” no “Bad Guys,” just Globalists and those who refuse to be collectivized.

Staunchly in the camp of “Team Multipolar World Order,” the Trilateral Commission, previously exposed by this author as financiers for Smart Cities throughout the Asia-Pacific, haven’t neglected to do the same in Eastern Europe.

Trilaterals Over Moscow

As in China, Russia’s UN-compliant Smart Cities are, in part, financed by corporations heavily affiliated with the Trilateral Commission. Kazan Smart City, Russia’s analogue to China’s Tianjin Eco-City, is the same Technocratic dystopia represented by Agenda 21 projects the world over.

You can read all about the future of human serfdom in Kazan Smart City’s colorful pamphlet.

Screenshot from 2015-10-08 21:24:51

The boundless and global tentacles of Agenda 21 have slipped over the “impenetrable” BRICS wall into each and every “anti-Hegemon” nation, with Smart City startup capital from the Trilateral Commission in tow. Kazan joins the deleterious coalition of Kashiwa no-ha in Japan, Songdo in South Korea, the aforementioned Tianjin Eco-City, and numerous others subsumed by the Trilateralist vision of Zbignew Brzezinski’s “technetronic era.”

Even the mighty Bear of the East is not immune.

Kazan’s Trilateral connection comes by way of its “public-private partnership” with German multinational giant Allianz, whose American subsidiary, PIMCO, is infamous for hiring former Fed chairmen as Senior Economic advisers – most recently, Ben Bernanke.

Allianz as it appears on Kazan Smart City's "Partners" brochure

Allianz as it appears in Kazan Smart City’s “Partners” brochure

As the Trilateral Commission’s official rosters dating back to at least 2011 demonstrate, Allianz has consistently placed Trilaterals in key positions within its corporate hierarchy:

OliverAllianzWolfgangAllianzEnricoAllianzHenningAllianz

Some of whom have some rather interesting affiliations themselves:AlfonzoAllianz

KatinkaAllianz

Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Russians, oh my!

In spite of the Commission’s regular removal of “outdated” rosters from its website, the 2011 and April 2015 rosters cited herein are still available via the Wayback Machine – an ironic example of the digital Panopticon working in favor of Free Humanity.

Unfortunately, Kazan isn’t even the most egregious example of “sustainable development” within Russia’s borders; that honor goes to Skolkovo Innovation Center, a planned Smart City to be erected outside of Moscow.

Artist rendering of Skolkovo

Artist rendering of Skolkovo

Dubbed as “Russia’s Silicon Valley” by its proponents, Skolkovo’s envisioned Technofeudal design will be all too familiar to Agenda 21 researchers – a “sustainable” city run by a coalition of “experts” and machines, with individuals subordinate to the Cybernetic collective:

What makes Skolkovo particularly noteworthy, however, is not its cookie-cutter UN-mandated design, nor its wholehearted approval by the Kremlin, but the unique public-private partnerships underlying its development. The project is a venerable smorgasbord of Military-Industrial Complex firms, cybersecurity companies, and multinational corporations – most of whom are heavily associated with (you guessed it) the Trilateral Commission.

The list of “Key Partners” on Skolkovo’s website (archived here for posterity) are too many to note: Boeing, Cisco, DOW, Airbus, General Electric, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Samsung, Siemens – the list goes on. The insidiousness and scope of the aforementioned companies’ involvement in unsavory affairs as varied as Smart Cities, war profiteering, precrime AI, eugenics, and economic Globalization, too, are far beyond the scope of this article.

Skolkovo’s Trilateralist connections, though, simply cannot be overlooked:

  • BOEING:
    Screenshot from 2015-10-19 16:20:39boeingtrilat
  • DOW:
    Screenshot from 2015-10-19 16:22:12
  • GENERAL ELECTRIC (GE):
    Screenshot from 2015-10-19 16:35:12
  • INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES (IBM):
    ibmtrilat
  • SAMSUNG: Screenshot from 2015-10-19 16:25:09
  • SIEMENS:
    Screenshot from 2015-10-08 21:05:56Screenshot from 2015-10-08 21:06:28

 

 

Anglo-American vision, Trilateral Commission cash, and Russian collectivist engineering – what could possibly go wrong? Surely, Reader, you’re already planning your trip; just remember, those with combustion engine-based transportation need not apply!

Conclusions

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”

-Mark Twain

It may be difficult for one to separate the ongoing conflict between the Anglo-American Establishment and Moscow in the realm of geopolitics, particularly as a fierce proxy war between the two over the Leviathan gas field’s planned transit line to Europe rages on in Syria; but the contrast between this 2D chessboard and the multilateral, multipolar 3D chess match cannot be more stark.

The Kremlin, echoing the People’s Bank of China, have called for an end to the Dollar as world reserve currency to be replaced not by the Yuan, Ruble, or gold, but the IMF’s Special Drawing Right:

Russia, like China and every other UN member state to date, has taken the “sustainable” bait – knowingly or unknowingly, she has set herself on the path of resurrecting the dream of the USSR’s “planned cities” of olde, ignoring the nightmare they actually came to represent. Like the Soviet power elite of the 20th Century, Russia’s modern power elite have turned to Anglo-American financiers and Globalist Machiavellian schemers in fulfilling this mandate, even as bullets fly in Syria and Ukraine.

From Magnitogorsk to Kazan, from Gorki to Skolkovo, the vision of Technocracy lives on. So, too, do the Globalist entities positioned to pick up the pieces after an engineered conflict between East and West.

My advice to you, Reader? Don’t surrender your autonomy by picking sides, relegating your fate to that of a mere playing piece.

Get off the Chessboard entirely.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider a small donation! -Rusticus
Bitcoin: 1MecdGKVEP6oVpQW11sKgTFBtNKUnu1Dse
DASH: XvBWCtU9wnBVYjNusP33jUf7y1uF9EqJsJ 

Agenda 2030 and the “New Economic World Order” – Coming This Year?

With Q3 of the 2015 fiscal year just around the corner, one cannot help but notice unprecedented unease in both financial and social spheres, and perhaps with good reason; with alternative media forecasters, national banks, and supranational institutions alike heralding the coming of “global depression” by the end of 2016, this consensus of seemingly strange bedfellows almost universally agree that something wicked this way comes.

These dire economic prognostications exist simultaneously in a world in which energy and development prospects, both nationally and transnationally, are being reworked – with equally profound implications as the aforementioned financial trend analysis. Be it the Obama Administration’s “Clean Power Plan” or the EU and China’s planned Neomalthusian 2030 carbon emission cutbacks, national entities the world over are positioning themselves for profound shifts in energy, development, trade, and even currency ahead of COP21 in Paris this December, or as some have deemed it, “Agenda 2030.”

The convergence of both engineered economic crisis and an engineered “sustainable development” crisis in late-2015 are hardly coincidental, nor are they insignificant. While the alternative finance community seems destined to eternally squabble about the mechanics of a coming global depression, few have set themselves to the task of projecting what the character of such a post-depression society will look like – and the “New World Economic Order” it has the potential to initiate.

It is this author’s contention that the character of this coming era can only be understood when financial calamity is viewed in tandem with Agenda 21’s faux-ecological insidiousness; and you, Reader, deserve the knowledge and documentation of this sagacious plot. It’s pervasive, it’s global, and has existed (in its modern form) since at least the 1970s.

Seeking to contextualize this historical continuity, we must first examine the writings of erudite anti-Technocracy researcher, Patrick Wood, and his pioneering work on the Trilateral Commission’s “New International Economic Order” of the 1970s.

Technocracy and the “New International Economic Order”

As an integral decade in this ongoing “Age of Transitions,” the 1970s brought with it previously unimagined sociopolitical and economic shifts. Inflation was prevalent. The decade also saw the rise of the Petrodollar and the end of the gold-backed Bretton Woods era, as well as the seeding of eugenic “environmental catastrophe” memes propagated by works like the Club of Rome’s 1972 publication, Limits to Growth, or John P. Holdren’s equally Neomalthusian and lauded Ecoscience. It also saw the birth of the Trilateral Commission, co-founded by David Rockefeller and Zbignew Brzezinski in 1973, who, among other things, pushed forth the concept of a “New International Economic Order” to quell the world’s ailing economic and environmental “doom and gloom” forecasts.

While the nature of this “New International Economic Order” at the time evaded Mr. Wood and his research partner, Dr. Antony Sutton, the perspective granted by the passage of time has lead Patrick Wood to declare Technocracy to be the true aim of this New Order. He writes:

It is plainly evident today, with 40 years of historical examination behind it, that the “New International Economic Order” was really “new” and envisioned historic Technocracy as replacing Capitalism altogether. Technocracy was based on energy rather than money and its system of supply and demand that regulates pricing. Some distinctives of Technocracy include:

• Elimination of private property and wealth accumulation
• Replacing traditional education with workforce training
• Micromanaging all energy distribution and consumption
• Driving people to live in a limited number of cities and off of rural land
• Enforcing a balance between nature’s resources and man’s consumption of them.

Are you thinking that this list is vaguely familiar? You should, because it represents the modern manifestation of programs like Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, Smart Grid, Cap And Trade, Climate Change, Common Core, massive surveillance operations and a whole lot more. All of this has been brought to us by the machinations of the Trilateral Commission and its members since 1973, and it is all part of its master plan to completely replace capitalism with Technocracy. This is their “New International Economic Order“!

-Patrick Wood, Endgame of Technocracy

The Trilateral Commission, however, was not alone in the propagation of the “New International Economic Order” ideal. As with all things global and “sustainable,” the United Nations is sure to be lurking nearby. The UN’s “Council on Trade and Development” (or UNCTAD) was the chief multinational institution (in cooperation with the Trilateral Commission) in proudly promoting such a New Order throughout the decade:

UNCTAD's history promoting the "New International Economic Order" from their official website.

UNCTAD’s history promoting the “New International Economic Order” from their official website.

As noted in my previous article about COP21 and the coming Agenda 21 “update,” documentation on what this “binding and legal agreement” entails directly from UN sources related to the Conference is sparse; that is, until one abandons searching for literature on the “green” facade and goes straight to the source of the “New International Economic Order” itself – that is, global trade governance, as documented by UNCTAD:

It is within UNCTAD’s 2015 policy briefs that we begin to find some semblance of clarity as to what a post-global depression geopolitical and economic environment has in store for us; and as all burgeoning Hegelians know, global problems invite (engineered) global solutions.

UNCTAD and the “Sustainable Multilateral” Vision of Humanity

Brief 36 (1)Over the past 40 years, the “New International Economic Order” has changed its name and structure, but never its primary objectives. Its old name cast away in favor of representing our increasingly captive and globalized world, “Multilateral Global Trade Governance” is its new moniker. The threats of population bombs, peak oil, and Global Cooling prevalent in the 70s, too, have given way to the phantom foes of carbon emissions and “unsustainability” so overtly propagandized to us in the 21st Century.

In true Technocratic fashion, UNCTAD declares the new face of “transformative” and “multilateral” global governance to be underpinned by none other than sustainable development in their 2015 Policy Brief No. 31:
Brief 31 (1)This shift towards “multilateralism” is more than rhetorical, representing a structural change in the nature of globalism. It’s also not limited to UNCTAD, as the IMF, BIS, World Bank, and yes, even the BRICS have been calling for a “New Multipolar World Order” for quite some time. This new form of globalism is slated to be seemingly inclusive, allowing nations like China, Russia, India, and Brazil some measure of regional control, while ultimately being subservient to the “binding and legal agreement” of COP21. Continuing with Policy Brief No. 31:
Brief 31 (2)We see that these new “inclusive multilateral mechanisms” are anything but voluntary, as UNCTAD goes on to conclude that such mechanisms would “preclude competitive liberalization;” in other words, multilateralism is designed to prevent Second and Third World nations from seeking a development structure outside the UN’s “sustainable” vision.

If any are still in doubt as to whether the BRICS alliance and its New Development Bank represent this globalist multilateral trap, UNCTAD steadfastly declare the BRICS to be an integral regional component in this plot:
Brief 31 (3)This latest forecast echoes UNCTAD’s 2014 publication, A BRICS Development Bank: A Dream Coming True? which also holds the BRICS NDB as a key partner in Agenda 21 and its global Technocratic serfdom, written about at length by this author previously.

This bank-against-bank dialectic is the Globalist version of Coke vs. Pepsi. Republicans vs. Democrats. East vs. West. BRICS Bank vs. World Bank. Multilateral vs. Monopolar. All result in the synthesis of “global trade governance” aspired to by the Anglo-American Establishment and Agenda 21.

In UNCTAD’s Policy Brief on Climate Change No. 4, the structure of this new system of governance was enumerated upon by none other than Chinese (Editorial Correction: S. Korean) UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon. If his description does not represent “multilateral globalism,” I don’t know what does:
Brief 4 (1)Supposedly sovereign nations will be subservient to regional entities (BRICS, NAFTA, EU, etc). Regional entities will abide by a commonly agreed upon set of global development and economic standards (COP21). The city, town, and community, long subsumed by ICLEI’s “sustainable development” principles as set forth by Rio ’92, are already in lock-step with this “multilateral globalism.”

“And what of the individual,” one may ponder? Such an “outmoded” concept has no place in the eternal Cybernetic feedback loop of “green” global trade governance as outlined by UNCTAD:
Brief 4 (2)The aforementioned “knowledge sharing,” “peer reviewing,” and “accountability” standards will be handled not wholly by governing bodies, but governing algorithms, as such banal tasks are likely to be managed by our increasingly “smart” cities, metering devices, homes, and cars; a shift destined to portend the increased control such devices will bring to everyday life within this “New Multilateral Economic Order.”

It is unlikely that such sweeping alterations to global as well as social interaction will take place unless “motivated” by periods of crisis. In UNCTAD’s Policy Brief No. 36, the importance of our last global crisis of 2008 in creating the prerequisites for “Green” Globalism is noted:
Brief 36 (2) Brief 36 (6)It therefore stands to reason that the activation of these bilateral, regional, and megaregional trade agreements created in the wake of the 2008 Depression will likewise require economic calamity to activate; calamity that alternative media and the Bank for International Settlements alike are predicting as inevitable. If such a “transformative” global structure is to be initiated in advance of or around COP21 this December, the remainder of 2015 is likely to be wrought with continued economic uncertainty.

The brief goes on to note a number of transnational corporations complying with this new Green Globalism, some of whom should be familiar to the astute Deep Political reader and researcher:
Brief 36 (8)

All have been intimately involved in the Neomercantile “opening of China” and the rampant technological buildup of the East by Western capital since the 90s, with IBM’s insidious participation in programs as varied as the Holocaust, police precrime algorithms, and the invention of the “smart city” concept being well documented. Of Lucent Technologies and IBM specifically, James Corbett of The Corbett Report writes:

In the same time period, China rose from the 30th-largest target of US R&D investment to the 11th on the back of a doubling of US affiliates in the country. The list of companies that started major R&D activities or facilities in China in the 1990s reads like a who’s who of the CFR-nested Fortune 500 set: DuPont, Ford, General Electric, General Motors, IBM, Intel, Lucent Technologies, Microsoft, Motorola, and Rohm and Haas all had a significant stake in China by the beginning of the 21st century.

-James Corbett, The Great Decoupling: How the West is Engineering its Own Downfall

So it would seem this same set of “CFR-nested Fortune 500” companies responsible for building up China’s industrial and technological capacity are now pushing forth sustainable development with the UN as well as within the BRICS nations themselves. Have these Western entities bolstered China’s modern economic stature out of sheer goodwill? Merely self-interested profiteering? Or is the fulfillment of this greater collectivist agenda the “quid pro quo” demanded by the West in exchange for such niceties as increased regional power in the Asia-Pacific?

This year’s demise of the BRICS economies (most notably China) as well as key Western markets, if not overtly coordinated, certainly provide a unique opportunity to bring about these proposed “global (green) solutions” to “global crises.”

In Closing

As this blog has set out to demonstrate since its inception, globalism is indeed what its title claims – global. It knows no borders, nations, or ideologies, save complete and utter transnational subjugation of autonomous human beings – globally. Technocracy – rule by a class of entrenched elites and “snitch society” technologies – will be the character of this coming global era. Sustainable development (Agenda 21) is its vehicle.

It doesn’t reach the “End of the Road” without a transition from the “Old Economic World Order” to the New, a divergence impossible without a global economic crisis the likes of which has not been seen in nearly a Century.

Agenda 21 and the prospect of economic calamity have been inseparable concepts since the ravings of former UN Under-Secretary General and co-Agenda 21 architect, Maurice Strong, became a matter of public record back in 1992. In talking with late activist George Washington Hunt at a UN Environment Conference in Colorado, Strong, under the auspices of a fictional book he hoped to pen, mused casually about how such a “New World Order” could take shape:

What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? In order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?

This group of world leaders forms a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists.  They’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the leaders at Davos as hostage. The markets can’t close.

-Maurice Strong

Strong abruptly ended his tale by concluding that he “probably shouldn’t be saying things like this.” Not that he had to continue, as from where we stand in 2015, we can see how this tale ends: With Strong’s world on the horizon. The next engineered economic crisis, ready to be sprung with a proverbial “flip of the switch,” will certainly be a global one. Yet Strong’s fantasies of Davos hostage takings of over twenty years ago may prove entirely unnecessary at COP21 in our modern era, as nearly all opposition to Agenda 21 on the global stage has been subsumed by its promise of complete technological control and a seat at the “multilateral table.”

You, though, Reader, have no seat at this table. An ostensibly insignificant cog in an international machine; but armed with the knowledge of what is to come, perhaps a cog that may someday soon decide to grind to a halt. This machine, after all, is each and every one of us.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider a small donation! -Rusticus
Bitcoin: 1MecdGKVEP6oVpQW11sKgTFBtNKUnu1Dse
DASH: XvBWCtU9wnBVYjNusP33jUf7y1uF9EqJsJ