Category Archives: Guest Posts

GUEST POST: Trump Will Be President – How Alt-Market Called It Five Months in Advance

trumppodium

By Brandon Smith of Alt-Market

Taking a hard-line position on the outcome of any world changing event is not an easy thing to do, especially when your position is contrary to about 99% of your peers.  The chorus of voices telling you that you are wrong (or crazy) is enough to drive most people to simply parrot the majority view and avoid the incessant browbeating.  The alternative media and the liberty movement suffer from this problem almost as much as the so-called mainstream does.

That said, you do what you have to do when you see a subversive play unfolding in the geopolitical game that the elites are playing.

During the first half of 2016, I made the “wild” prediction that the Brexit referendum vote would in fact be successful.  Only a couple of other analysts in the world made the same prediction, but did so months beforehand and never reiterated their prediction again.  I based my prediction, which I stood by to the very day of the vote, on the behavior and rhetoric I had observed among the global banking elites prior to the Brexit.  The elites had adopted a steady narrative; the claim that “populists” (conservatives) were about to rise in political power, and that this would lead to the collapse of the financial world.

My theory – elites and globalists were about to open the door for conservatives to take control of a ship that was already sinking.  And, once our financial ship sunk, they would blame conservative movements for the collapse that the ELITES had originally created.  In other words, conservatives are being set up as scapegoats for a global fiscal crisis that has been decades in the making.

In my post-Brexit analysis article titled ‘Brexit Aftermath – Here’s What Happens Next’, published in June, I stated:

“In light of the Brexit I’m going to have to call it here and now and predict that the most likely scenario for elections will be a Trump presidency.  Trump has consistently warned of a recession during his campaign and with the Brexit dragging markets lower over the next few months, he will probably be proven “prophetic.”

….Even if Trump is a legitimate anti-establishment conservative, his entry into the Oval Office will seal the deal on the economic collapse, and will serve the globalists well.  The international banks need only pull the plug on any remaining life support to the existing market system and allow it to fully implode, all while blaming Trump and his conservative supporters.

The mainstream media has been consistently comparing Trump supporters to Brexit supporters, and Trump himself has hitched his political wagon to the Brexit. This fits perfectly with the globalist narrative that populists and conservatives are killing the global economy and placing everyone at risk.”

In my article ‘2016 Will End With Economic Instability And A Trump Presidency’ I stated:

“I am consistently reminded of the Brexit surprise when I look today at the polling numbers on the U.S. election.  The erratic and inconsistent polling shows Trump climbing, then suddenly sinking days later, then climbing again without any clear catalysts.  Many polls contradict each other, just as the polls did before the Brexit, and, the same kind of circus atmosphere is present, if not more prevalent.

It may be possible, if not certain, that this is all a game.  The Brexit outcome was predetermined, which is how elites like George Soros scored successful investment bets on the referendum passing, and the reason why the Bank for International Settlements gathered central bankers from around the world as the vote was taking place.

I believe that the U.S. presidential election has also been predetermined; with a Trump win.”

In my most recent article ‘Why The U.S. Presidential Election Has The Entire World Confused’ I stated:

“U.S. elections are indeed controlled, and have been for decades, primarily through the false left/right paradigm.  However, as I have been pointing out since I correctly predicted the success of the Brexit referendum, I don’t think that Clinton is the choice of the elites.”

“To be clear, my position is that Trump is slated to take the White House and that this is by design.  This has been my position since before Trump won the Republican Primaries, it was my position when the election cycle began, it has never changed, nor have my views on the reasons for this outcome ever changed…”

I have to say, I received more attacks on my Trump call than I did my Brexit call.  The vast consensus was that a Hillary Clinton win was inevitable.  It would seem that my position has once again been vindicated (and yes, I am congratulating myself).

The bottom line is, Trump is on the way to the White House because the elites WANT HIM THERE.  Now, many liberty proponents, currently in a state of elation, will either ignore or dismiss the primary reason why I was able to predict the Brexit and a Trump win.  These will probably be some of the same people that were arguing with me only weeks ago that the elites would NEVER allow Trump in office.

So, to clarify:

Trump may or may not be aware that he and his conservative followers have been positioned into a a trap.  We will have to wait and see how he behaves in office (and he WILL be in office, despite the claims of some that the elites will try to “stop him” before January).  My primary point is THAT IT DOES NOT MATTER, at least not at this stage.  The elites will initiate a final collapse of the global economy under Trump’s watch (this will probably escalate over the course of the next six months), and they WILL blame him and conservatives in general.  This IS going to happen.   The elites play the long game, and so must we.

While millions of Americans are celebrating Trump’s win today, I will remain even more vigilant.  The party is just getting started, folks.  Don’t get too comfortable.

Stay tuned for my next article, in which I will predict the likely trends and changes that will take place through December into 2017.  In the meantime, please continue to support Alt-Market so that I can keep bringing accurate analysis and predictions to the Liberty Movement.

Regards,

Brandon Smith, Founder of Alt-Market.com

GUEST POST: De-Dollarization is Now Assured – SDR Bond Issued by World Bank in China

Rory Hall of The Daily Coin hits it out of the park with this one – a very important story with prescient commentary, and yet more evidence of the Hegelian “East-West Changeover” so often discussed here at Stateless Homesteading. The “writing on the wall” for SDR-denominated bonds in China has been visible since at least April of this year, when the PBOC began releasing data on currency reserves denominated in SDRs (which we covered here). 

First the Yuan’s rapid integration with the IMF’s SDR basket (as predicted by this author in Summer of 2015), then the AIIB’s joint World Bank development pact, now SDR-denominated Chinese bonds issued by none other than the World Bank. Is this an Eastern effort to launch a “Trojan Horse of Reform” into the heart of the Western financial system, or are these merely China’s outward attempts to fully integrate themselves as a multilateral “partner” in the Globalist borg? Can a meat grinder be “reformed” into a cow?

Only with the retrospection of history will we know the outcome, though this author’s personal take on the matter is likely known to you by now. Thanks as always for reading and check back for more updates soon!

Rusticus

Original Author: The Daily Coin

This just hit the wire and confirms what we have been discussing for the past couple of weeks. The World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, IBRD) has approved the People’s Bank of China to issue the SDR Bond. This is a major first step in delivering a realistic blow to the dominance of the U.S. dollar as world reserve currency. It is no secret that China has been making international moves to make the Renminbi (RMB) a more attractive currency on the global stage. This latest move solidifies the RMB as a world currency.

There has not yet been set a launch date for the first issuance of this new SDR Bond, however, in previous communiques there has been discussion to launch as soon as the end of August.

A lot of you are probably thinking “big deal, who cares”. Well, once this bond reaches it’s 3rd, 4th issuance and the demand begins to grow the impact this will have on U.S. Treasuries could be significant. The United States is the largest debtor nation in the history of the world and the U.S. Treasuries are the financial instrument that creates and maintains that debt. Once all these U.S. Treasuries begin flowing back into the U.S. economy that has the potential to create a lot more inflation that we are currently experiencing. That is merely one aspect of the overall. So, yes, it’s a big deal.

One of the main characteristics of this new SDR Bond is it will be issued in SDRs and redeemable in Renminbi (Yuan). The significants of this can not be overstated. This means that an investor in America who purchases the new SDR Bond will now have exposure to the RMB and hold fewer dollars in their portfolio. These investors can then use those SDR Bonds as collateral to make other purchases. The renminbi will now be on a level playing field as the other currencies that make up the SDR Basket of currencies. Currently the SDR Basket of currencies is made up of US dollars, Euro, Japanese Yen, British Pound Stirling and as of October 1, 2016 the Chinese Renminbi.

This is a big deal and has the potential to forever change the U.S. dollar and the bond market. Nay-sayers will be quick to point out these bonds were tried in the past. While that is true, the economic times were not as they are today.

As Eric Dubin, The News Doctors, described the beginning phases of this new bond “will be like flicking grains of rice into the bond market“. While I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, over the coming months and years the impact will be very real. As the AIIB, BRICS Bank, New Development Bank, PBOC and other banks around the world begin, in earnest, to convert their bond holdings to the SDR Bond the market will begin evolving and once it reaches critical mass the hordes will rush in, just as they always have in the past.

According to the World Bank:

The size of the World Bank’s new issuance program is 2 billion SDRs (approximately equivalent to USD 2.8 billion). The bonds will be denominated in SDRs and payable in Chinese renminbi (RMB). The precise timing of issue and individual bond terms will be based on market conditions at the time of issuance.

During the 1970’s we did not have Quantitative Easing, Zero Interest Rate Policy nor Negative Interest Rate Policies. We also did not have derivatives, nor “too big to fail” banks. So, yes the SDR bonds first appearance was a failure, however, everything has changed and the world looks and acts a lot different than back then.

World Bank explains further:

“This is a landmark development for China’s bond market and for the SDR as an international reserve asset,” said World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim. “We are very pleased to support China’s growing role in global financial markets. World Bank issuance of SDR bonds in China will support the G-20’s objective of expanding the use of SDRs and help promote the development of China’s domestic capital market. It will also increase Chinese investors’ access to foreign currencies in the domestic bond market, while opening up new opportunities for international investors seeking high-quality investment products in the country.”

Since I am a betting man my money is on these bonds being supercharged right out of the gate. My bet is there are nations around the world looking for an alternative to the U.S. Treasury and world reserve currency system. Change has arrived. The dollars days are numbered. How long it will take for the dollar to transform is yet unknown, however, what is known is this – China is on the rise, China has the wealth, the gold and support of the banking cabal around the world. What China also has is more than $1 TRILLION in U.S. Treasuries that she will begin converting to SDR Bonds over the next several months and years. Count on it.

Yet Another Perspective on the Coup in Turkey: The Drugs Connection

After publishing my initial article on the Turkish “coup” within the context of the drug trade, none other than esteemed researcher Dr. Joseph P. Farrell of Giza Death Star reblogged the entry as well as added his unique perspective (or “high octane speculation,” as he calls it).

Dr. Farrell’s take on international intelligencia from all major nation-states (Russia included) forming a “Sullivan and Cromwell” of sorts for drugs is precisely what I was alluding to when mentioning the “globalization of the drug trade” in my thesis. His elaboration on this notion goes beyond what there was room for in my own article, so I re-present his work here in hopes that inquiring Readers will investigate further. 

Stay tuned! -Rusticus

By Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

In the aftermath of the “coup” in Turkey, there has been so much speculation on who was behind it, and why, that adding yet more grist to the mill may seem counterproductive. After all, too much grist and the mill simply ceases to function. But a regular reader here, Ms. S.H. found this important article, and it’s significant enough that I thought it deserved to be passed along:

As you’ll note, the essence of the article is that the drug trade in opium flows from Afghanistan through Incirlik airbase – which, notably, the Sultan has turned on the power again and allowed NATO bombing missions to continue- and from Incirlik on to the markets in North America and, presumably, Europe.

There’s some nuggets in this article, however, that contain their own clues for some high octane speculation, from the “globalization” of the drug trade:

But quality heroin has done a bit of “Globalization” in its own right, as such “good dope” is no longer the purview of Eastern regions exclusively. Shortly after Colombia and neighboring nations stepped up production of high-grade white heroin, Mexican Cartels (spearheaded by the Sinaloas) abandoned their position as lowly black-tar producers and middle-men, turning Guerrero’s staple cash crop from avocados to poppy in just a few short years:

…to the formation of “Drug trusts” (somewhat misnamed “Cartels”) controlling the entire process from production to distribution, and even allegations that “GMO opium” has also entered the stream of the drug trade:

Some have even speculated that this global heroin explosion and corresponding quality increase is due, in no small part, to the emergence of Genetically Modified poppy plants. While hard evidence of this claim remains elusive, in a world where even GM yeast has proven effective in producing opiods, the thought can hardly be dismissed outright.

All this leads to the following thesis:

This investigation started with questions about the future of the NATO-backed drug terminal run out of Incirlik Air Base amidst ongoing political instability in Turkey; and while this author has succeeded in documenting CIA’s longstanding “alternative” to Incirlik being rapidly built up in West Africa as well as the fever-pitch of development to turn Southern Mexico into the next Northern Afghanistan, I must confess that I do not know exactly what this spells for the future of Turkish regime change.

I can, however, posit a hypothesis: As international gold reserves between West and East are being globalized, world currency holdings between nations via the SDR are being globalized, and the “new energy paradigm” of Agenda 21 is being globalized, is it inconceivable to think that the global drug trade, too, is being “equitably internationalized?”

Unfortunately, I don’t have the answer to this question – but I bet a fly on the wall at last week’s meeting between John Kerry and Vladimir Putin could shed some light on the situation.

So let’s do a bit of high octane speculation. Most readers here are aware that Sultan Erdogan was involved in corruption of his own, soaking up money from ISIS’s oil trade and shipments via Turkey, until Mr. Putin put an end to that. Let us also recall that recent revelations indicate that Erdogan’s government was warned by Russia of an impending coup. Most of the speculation out there has centered upon the idea that with the apparent extent of the coup, it would have been impossible for at least someone’s intelligence services picking up on it. But the entrance of the drug trade into the picture alters this consideration, and not inconsiderably.  I take it as a given that the drug trade is not a CIA-only affair, but rather, that it is the principal means for most intelligence agencies to have access to funds free from the oversight of their respective governments, and that thus, the international “mafia” forms a kind of network of its own, a kind of “power of attorney” for all these intelligence agencies, a kind of “Sullivan and Cromwell” of the underworld, a firm that will broker for anyone for a “cut of the action”. At this deep level, the CIA, FSI, MI6, Mossad, GRU, and so on, are all interconnected. It is an underground information flow. The article itself mentions the late Gary Webb’s research into illicit drug operations of the American intelligence community in this regard. But we might equally mention Stephen Handelman’s Comrade Criminal: Russia’s New Mafiya and its overtones of Russian-KGB and GRU involvement in these drug(and teror) networks for some time. So, could this coup, which followed so quickly upon Mr. Erdogan’s sudden about-face in the Middle East, have provided Mr. Erdogan a golden opportunity not only to break with his Suni-Wahhabist allies of yesterday to pursue Turkey’s own Sufist version of Islamicization, but also have afforded him the opportunity to cash in on a relationship with Russia and China and their “silk road” project, including a hefty piece of the action for the drug trade?

And let’s not hold back in our high octane speculations: could drugs and the domination of Central Asia poppy fields and distribution routes, be what this is all about?

I don’t know about you, but I have a strong suspicion that this is the case.

See you on the flip side…

BREXIT Vote Passes! Here’s how Alt-Market Called It When No One Else Did

I hope to write on the greater end-game of “BREXIT” and what such a move spells for the IMF’s planned SDR re-weighting later this Fall, but for now, Brandon Smith of Alt-Market echoes my sentiments wholeheartedly. The move, while seemingly cause for celebration, ultimately has the potential to end with both the Pound and the Euro significantly weaker going into this IMF basket re-weighting, allowing the RMB to take monetary helm of the “multilateral World Order” now emerging. 

If these “sweeping Populist movements” already emergent in much of Europe begin to secede en-masse or if the waves of BREXIT cause commercial bank defaults, the debt hologram collective of the European Union will no longer be foisting usurious austerity upon and bailing out neighboring countries – they will be seeking bailouts themselves. Only supranational institutions like the IMF are able to facilitate this task, and Europe may find itself “out of the EU frying pan and into the Multipolar fire.”

While it remains to be seen exactly what the fate of the global economy will be post-BREXIT, it’s important to view these changes within the context of recent events as well as history:

  • The UK never adopted the Euro as a currency, keeping the Pound Sterling in place even as Euroskeptic resistance in nations like France and Germany failed to do the same.
  • The UK, despite now finding itself in the tenuous position of having to re-negotiate trade deals with its former bedfellows in the EU, are prepared for this contingency: They were the first major Western nation to join the AIIB, a move that “shocked” the financial world but was quite predictable for those of us who realize the Anglo-American Establishment’s history in China as well as the “East-West changeover” now in progress.
  • The Pound is a member of the SDR basket and its weighting is individually calculated from the Euro; if the upcoming re-weighting of the SDR includes a hefty share to the RMB, as scripted by Chatham House, a stalwart AIIB partner like the UK would stand to benefit. The City of London, it would seem, has planned for their European headquarters and gateway to the East to have a destiny somewhat insulated from the Eurozone chaos at large.
  • Equally important is that, were the Eurozone to begin to disintegrate as a whole, the “rebooted” currencies of continental Europe (Drachma, Franc, Lira, Deutchemark, etc.) would find themselves excluded from the multipolar SDR currency regime – no longer a fief of the Technocrats in Brussels, but instead, indentured servants of Global Governance. 

For the record, none of these musings should indicate that I am “against” a departure of the UK from the Eurozone – I applaud the sentiments of the referendum and populist rejection of Globalism wholeheartedly! This type of populist expression, however, (playing the game of Nation-States as opposed to exercising individual and localized solutions) is easily re-directed by the Aikido-like reflexes of Globalism into something far different than what was intended; if it wasn’t scripted this way from the outset, of course.

My commentary is getting a bit long in the tooth, so I’ll leave you now with Mr. Smith’s fantastic macrofinancial analysis. Check back for more updates soon!

-Rusticus

Brandon Smith, Alt-Market

Yes, in case you fell asleep before the votes were tallied, the UK referendum has passed and global markets are currently in a freefall we have not seen since 2008.  In this case, I’m going to have to trumpet my successful call here.  For all the general flak I received in emails for my predictions of a Brexit passage including in my article ‘Brexit: Global Trigger Event, Fake Out Or Something Else’ which was published during the height of the polling disinformation frenzy, I think it is important to explain how I was able to discern how the vote was likely to turn out when no one else did.

Also, if there were other analysts that did predict a Brexit win and I am overlooking them, please list their names and where they made those predictions in the comments below so that we can give them their due credit.

Here’s why the vast majority of analysts were caught with their pants down on the UK referendum:

1) They assumed that the Brexit will hurt globalists – In the article linked above, I outlined why the Brexit actually aids international financiers and central banks by creating a scapegoat for a market crash that was ALREADY going to happen.  Rather than re-explaining my position, here is a large portion of quotations from that article:

I believe the Brexit vote may be allowed to succeed, here’s why…

1) Elites including George Soros have suddenly decided to dive into the market to place bets on the negative side. Dumping large portions of their stock holdings, shorting equities and buying up gold and gold mining shares. Soros has been preparing his portfolio for a successful Brexit vote while at the same time publicly warning of the supposed dire consequences if the referendum passes.  The last time Soros put this much capital into the markets was in 2007, just before the crash of 2008.

2) The IMF and the BIS have been warning since late 2015 (for six to eight months) that a global economic downturn is on the way in 2016. We saw considerable volatility at the beginning of this year, and markets are due for another shock. The last time the BIS and IMF were so adamant about an impending crash was in late 2007, just before the 2008 market plunge.

3) While the Federal Reserve has not yet implemented a second rate hike (I still believe they could use a rate hike this year to stab markets in the back if necessary), Janet Yellen pulled a maneuver which was almost as upsetting to investors. After the Fed policy meeting last week, markets were moderately exuberant and stocks were rising, then, Yellen opened her mouth and blamed the Brexit for the rate hike delay

Here is what the Fed has done: By delaying the second hike for another month, and then blaming the Brexit vote as a primary reason, they have created a bit of a paradox. If the Brexit vote passes, the Fed is asserting that they may not hike rates for a while, giving market investors the impression that the global economic recovery is not all that it is cracked up to be. If the Brexit vote fails, then the Fed MUST hike rates in July, otherwise, they lose all credibility. I believe Yellen’s claim that the Brexit vote was the cause of the hike delay was highly deliberate. It has triggered what may become a growing firestorm in equities and commodities.

From the point of view of investors, if the Brexit passes, then all hell breaks loose. If the Brexit fails, then the Fed will hike rates and once again, all hell breaks loose. Or, the Fed refuses to hike rates even though its number one scapegoat is out of the picture, it loses all credibility, and all hell breaks loose.

It’s a lose/lose/lose scenario for the investment world, which is probably why global markets plunged after Yellen’s remarks. Investors have been relying on the predictability of central bank intervention for so long that now when ANY uncertainty arises, they run for the hedges.

The Fed decision to blame the Brexit for their rate hike delay could indicate foreknowledge of a successful Brexit vote.

4) The recent murder of British lawmaker Jo Cox is perhaps the weirdest piece in the puzzle of the Brexit. For one thing, it makes no sense for a pro-Brexit nationalist (Thomas Mair) to attack and kill a pro-EU lawmaker when the polls for the “Leave” group were clearly ahead. One could simply argue that the guy was nuts, but I’m rather suspicious of “lone gunman,” and his insanity has yet to be proven.  I see no reason for this man, insane or not, to be angry enough to kill while the Brexit side was winning in all the polls.

If someone was using him as a weapon only to discredit the Brexit vote or sway the public towards staying in the EU, you would think that they would have initiated the murder closer to the day of the referendum when it would have the most effect. The information flooded public has days to digest new data and forget Jo Cox.

My theory? Thomas Mair has handlers or he is just a mentally disturbed patsy, and his purpose is indeed to paint the Brexit movement as “angry” or crazy. But this does not necessarily mean the intent behind the assassination of Jo Cox was to break the back of the Brexit movement. Rather, the goal may only be to perpetuate a longer term narrative that conservatives in general are a destructive element of society. We kill, we’re racists, we have an archaic mindset that prevents “progress,” we divide supranational unions, we even destroy global economies. We’re storybook monsters.

Even the cultural Marxists at the Southern Poverty Law Center somehow produced documents allegedly linking Mair (a veritable unknown) to Neo-Nazi groups in 1999. Wherever the SPLC is involved, the official story is always skewed.

The murder of Jo Cox has had a minimal effect on Brexit polling numbers.  In the end, the elites may find Thomas Mair more useful as a mascot for the Brexit AFTER the vote, rather than before the vote.

So now the Brexit movement, which is conservative in spirit, is labeled a “divisive” and “hateful group”, and if the referendum is triumphant, they will also be called economic saboteurs.

I thoroughly agree that the internationalists do not usually allow economic developments of a global nature to occur if those events are damaging to their base of power.  The problem is, Brexit is not damaging to their base of power in the long run.  In fact, the elites are aided by the Brexit because now they have British pro-sovereigns and the principle of sovereignty itself to blame for a market crash that they have actually been engineering for years.

2) They Believed The Polling Numbers – I take polling numbers into account at times but they are ultimately meaningless when you are dealing with global economic events.  As I point out above, such events are thoroughly played by internationalists.  What people should have been looking at instead of skewed polling numbers was the behavior of elites prior to the vote.  George Soros’ latest market bets were clearly on a crash (I’m sure he just raked in a handsome profit), and central bankers from around the world congregated at the Bank for International Settlements in preparation for the vote.  Janet Yellen blaming the Brexit for the Fed’s refusal to raise rates in June should have been a red flag for everyone.  When in doubt, always look at what the elites are doing with policy and their own money.

3)  They Have Grown Cynical – After eight years of constant market manipulation, the Liberty Movement in particular has grown rather cynical about whether or not the fundamentals even matter anymore.  I’m here to tell you, they do matter.  However, stocks today are not based on fundamentals, they are based on dubious investor psychology and algo-trading computers.  When investor psychology is broken, the markets are suddenly reminded of the terrible fundamentals of our economic system and stocks begin to crash.  Eventually, fundamentals will win over false financial optimism.  The international banks are well aware of this, and are merely allowing circumstances by which they can crash the markets THEIR WAY instead of allowing the markets to crash naturally.  Too many analysts overlooked the usefulness of Brexit to the elites because of their crippling cynicism.

4) They Missed The Bigger Picture – If all an analyst does is track equities and sometimes commodities, they are never going to grasp what is happening in the economy.  Our financial system is not based entirely on numbers and graphs; it is a sociopolitical apparatus.  Political and social developments can indeed signal what might happen in stocks and on mainstreet.  The relations are there, but they are often indirect.  In 2016, EVERYTHING is snowballing with tension.  It was only a matter of time before something snapped.  The timing of the Brexit amidst these tensions led me to believe it had a high probability of being a trigger for the next leg down.

So, the big question now is what happens as the circus continues?  I will be writing a comprehensive article on what is likely to occur over the next few months in markets and everywhere else in response to the Brexit event.  Look for that article to be published early next week.  I do believe that central banks around the world are probably going to take action at some point in the near term to mitigate the market collapse and slow it down slightly.  As I have always said, this is a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of the global economy; the elites want to steam valve the system down and are probably not going to allow a complete freefall.

You will most likely see a mainstream media campaign to marginalize the importance of the Brexit.  They will claim that the referendum is not necessarily binding yet. That it will take years to be instituted.  Frankly, this is not relevant.  Again, the markets are based on psychology first, and the damage has already been done.  Watch for further market disruptions to pile on before the U.S. elections, including other EU member states suggesting their own referendums.

Stay tuned to Alt-Market for further analysis…

Regards,

Brandon Smith, Founder of Alt-Market.com

GUEST POST: Let’s Cut the Crap, Vladimir Putin is Helping to Usher in the Globalist NWO

A very thought-provoking and thoroughly-sourced article by Ken of RedefiningGod. It’s a long read, but if you’re a regular here at Stateless Homesteading, this shouldn’t dissuade you!

On the morning the Turks downed the Russian airliner, I stumbled across this article from notorious disinformation mill Veterans Today…

vtputin

It is such a good example of East/West dialectic propaganda and the “Putin as Savior” con that I decided it would be a good teaching tool for helping people to get real. And given all the confusing narratives that swirl around Putin and the current world situation, I think the best approach is to focus on two fundamental, telling things…

1) Putin’s cooperation in the globalists’ 9/11 operation, and

2) Putin’s promotion of the globalists’ UN as the solution to our current woes.

So let’s get started…

PUTIN AND 9/11

Even if one looks at Vladimir Putin from a naive, conventional perspective, he is a former KGB officer and is therefore fully familiar with the concept of false-flag terror. This being the case, it would not have escaped his attention that on the day of the 9/11 attacks, three New York high-rises fell after only two were hit by aircraft. So as an intelligence professional, he would have known that something was fishy on the very first day. And in the days following the attacks, Russian intelligence merged with holes in the US government’s official story would have made the inconsistencies quite glaring. This raises an obvious question…

Why did he spend the next 14 years playing along with the 9/11 “Official Story”?

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, Putin stuck to the globalist talking points…
911puttalk
…From the BBC. Raw (untranslated) video of Putin making his remark on Bin Laden can be found here
putbinyou

And here are some key excerpts from the BBC article along with my comments…

>>> No proof needed

Mr Putin, who is in Brussels for meetings with European Union and Nato leaders, told reporters: “For us it is already clear. The only thing we do not know is the exact role he (Bin Laden) played (in the terror attacks on America). <<<

So Putin joined the globalist minion chorus in blaming the 9/11 attacks on Osama Bin Laden. This being so, could it be that Russian intelligence was unaware of Bin Laden’s close relationship with the CIA? Given that Bin Laden was a key figure in Russia’s war in Afghanistan, you can be sure they knew all about his CIA ties. And this means that Putin was attributing 9/11 to someone he knew was a CIA asset. For any reasonable person, this strongly suggests the possibility that the attacks were a false-flag operation conducted by the CIA, but Putin said nary a word about that, did he?

>>> The Russian president criticised Saudi Arabia for refusing to let the US launch attacks against Afghanistan from bases on its territory. <<<

So in addition to blaming the 9/11 attacks on Bin Laden, Putin was a cheerleader for the US attack on Afghanistan. One wonders if he was compensated for his support by being given the Russian distribution rights for Afghan opium.

>>> BBC Europe correspondent Justin Webb says President Putin is likely to try to persuade EU leaders that they, in turn, must be more willing to accept that Russia needs the freedom to take what actions it deems necessary in its ongoing battle against rebels in Chechnya. <<<

And this section brings us to Putin, Russian intelligence, and their own false-flag attacks against the Russian people. The Russian government are no strangers to the art of statecraft, and they too have used 9/11-style attacks to launch military action in places like Chechnya. See the Russian Apartment Bombings and the Beslan School Massacre for examples of their operations.

Getting back to Bin Laden and Afghanistan for a moment, have a look at this section of his Wikipedia bio…

Bin Laden met and built relations with Hamid Gul, who was a three-star general in the Pakistani army and head of the ISI agency. Although the United States provided the money and weapons, the training of militant groups was entirely done by the Pakistani Armed Forces and the ISI.”

So Bin Laden was connected to Hamid Gul, and can you guess who sat on the Editorial Board of Directors of Veterans Today until he died this past August?…
vtgul
…from Veterans Today

CIA to Bin Laden to Hamid Gul to Veterans Today — interesting connections, no? Truth be told, these high-level intelligence agents all work for the same people (the people who control all the money, the globalist central banksters) and they all know each other, which is why Putin’s support of the “blame Bin Laden” meme is all the more ridiculous. And if you are unfamiliar with what a rat’s nest of spooks and fraudsters Veterans Today is, have look at…

1) VT’s Chairman, Gordon Duff: Shady as Hell: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 1 – The Amazing Gordon Duff)
2) Gordon Duff’s company, Adamus Defense Group: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 3 – Gordon Duff’s “Adamus Group”)
3) VT’s Advisor, Leo Wanta: The Veterans Today / RT / PressTV Disinformation Conglomerate (Part 2 – Deconstructing the Bizarre Tale of Leo Wanta)

These guys are heavily involved in selling the East/West dialectic and the “savior” Putin to alternative news readers, which is why they put out garbage like the article featured at the top of this entry.

Now back to Putin…

Lest you think that Putin’s playing along with the Official Story was just BBC’s spin of his words, here are some things straight from the Kremlin website:

> Putin and Bush together pressed “all countries” to join the war on “terrorism” after 9/11…
911putkrem3
…From Kremlin.ru

> In the following month, November 2001, Putin visited the US and talked about Afghanistan during a speech at Rice University…
911putkrem2
…From Kremlin.ru. So even by the Kremlin’s own words, he was supporting the US invasion of Afghanistan and calling Bush’s stance “well grounded.” Yep, that’s a real truth-teller for ya.

> From there, Putin went on to visit Ground Zero in New York…
putin911
…From Kremlin.ru. If you read the article, you’ll see that he played it totally straight: he laid a wreath and expressed sorrow and solidarity over the “terrorist attack.”

> And Putin also sat for an interview with National Public Radio…
911putnpr
…From Kremlin.ru

I located the transcript of that interview on NPR.org. Here are two key excerpts…

>>> Question 17:

Mr. Siegel: President Bush now speaks of Osama bin Laden as “the evil one.” He uses the word “evil.” Is he also exaggerating now, and is it also a slogan for the day, or do you think that’s true?

President Putin: Actually, I think President Bush is being very mild in his choice of words. I have other definitions and epithets to offer, but I, of course, am being restrained by the fact that I am talking to the media and this is hardly appropriate.

The thing is that the people that you have just referred to, terrorists, especially terrorists who base themselves on man-hating fundamentalist ideas, these people, these terrorists, don’t really treat the rest of humanity as human beings. We are not even enemies, as far as they’re concerned. We’re just dust. We’re nothing and we’re a bunch of nobodies. And as people, these criminals deserve the most serious of attention and the most rigorous of treatment. <<<

So when questioned on Bin Laden, Putin expressed no reservations; he backed up President Bush’s narrative with gusto.

>>> From the Question 18 answer:

President Putin: …And I’m not afraid to say that openly, and I can tell you why, because exactly two years ago Russia was the first to come across the kind of terrorism that the Americans had to deal with on Sept. 11. And, of course, the scale was not as large but it was just as horrendous, where, in downtown Moscow and in other cities of the Russian Federation, residential buildings, apartment buildings, were exploded. And as a result of those acts of terror, hundreds of completely innocent people died. <<<

This passage reveals why Putin didn’t blow the whistle on Bush and 9/11. It’s because both he and Bush are globalist agents, and both he and Bush had conducted 9/11-style false-flags on their own people in order to advance the globalist agenda, both domestically (by tightening control over their people) and internationally (by drawing nations into multilateral efforts to fight “terrorism”).

Putin hasn’t told the truth about 9/11 because it simply isn’t time yet. The globalists had much to do after 9/11 to get us to where we are today, and now that they’re about ready to spring the Good Cop beats Bad Cop con, you’ll finally hear Putin speak the truth (some time between now and September of 2016).

[Part 2 – 27-28 November 2015]

PUTIN AND THE UNITED NATIONS

During Putin’s post-9/11 US tour in November of 2001, he also made a notable stop at the United Nations…
911putun
…From Kremlin.ru. Have a look at what the Russian article said about it…

>>> Mr Putin, in his turn, actively supported United Nations efforts against international terrorism, and stressed the necessity for all countries to comply with the resolutions and decisions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly. Mr Annan thanked Russia for its vanguard role in the UN’s fight against terrorism.

They also had a detailed discussion about the political settlement in Afghanistan and measures to prevent the country from turning into a hotbed of international terrorism. Mr Putin and Mr Annan agreed that decision-making on the future of Afghanistan was mainly up to Afghans with active assistance from the international community. <<<

So as you can see, both Putin and Annan were in with Bush on casting 9/11 as a real “international terrorist” attack and on “liberating” Afghanistan so it would stop being a “hotbed of international terrorism” (and start being a plantation for international opium production). But why, you ask? Because in order to bring the peoples of the world under UN/NWO control, the globalists must create global problems that require global solutions. One of the global problems they have purposefully manufactured is “international terrorism”; another is “manmade” climate change, and you’ll hear much more about this one in 3 short days…
cop21
Source

Besides Putin’s trip to the US, another very notable thing happened in November of 2001:the public was introduced to the “BRIC” concept. And it was done by none other than our good friends at Goldman Sachs
oneillbricsfull
…Here is a little about the paper’s author, Jim O’Neill, from Wikipedia

>>> Terence James “Jim” O’Neill, Baron O’Neill of Gatley (born 17 March 1957), retiring chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, is a British economist best known for coining BRIC, the acronym that stands for Brazil, Russia, India, and China—the four rapidly developing countries that have come to symbolise the shift in global economic power away from the developed G7 economies

He joined Goldman Sachs in 1997 and he was appointed as the head of global economics research in 2001, which is also when he published the seminal BRIC paper…

On 28 May 2015 he was created a Life Peer as Baron O’Neill of Gatley, of Gatley in the County of Greater Manchester. <<<

Isn’t it interesting that Goldman Sachs’ Head of Global Economics Research (and a darling of the London Establishment), “Baron O’Neill of Gatley,” was the one who started the BRICS movement? And from that point on, the globalists began to slowly divide the G20 into “shirts and skins” in order to run the East/West dialectic. The G7 shirts would be given the role of the bad guys, and the G5 skins (the BRICS) would be given the role of the good guys. Since the public have been raised from childhood on good guy vs. bad guy stories, letting the “good guys” bring in the NWO would be a nice, easy way to win the public over to the new system.

The slow transition from the post-9/11 love-in to the current-day East/West dialectic conflict began a year after “Baron” O’Neill unveiled the BRIC concept. As the globalists moved the US towards the invasion of Iraq, Putin took the public stance of opposing “unilateral” action…
iraqputuni
…From CBS News

As you can see, Putin was calling for compliance with the UN from both Iraq (in its weapons programs) and the US (in sticking to the UN’s multilateral approach instead of taking unilateral action). Making unilateral action by nation-states look bad while making multilateral actions within the globalist UN framework look good is a core element of globalist propaganda. Neutering the nation-state and empowering the global central government is what globalism is all about, and that’s what “good guy” Putin is selling. As the CBS article goes on to say…

>>> Putin said Russia agrees with United States that it is important to “make sure that Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction in its possession.” But he added that “we do believe that we have to stay within the framework of the work being carried out within the United Nations.” <<<

Now if we step back for a moment and ponder all this, we see that there are two globalist agendas in play at the end of 2002: 1) the war on terror agenda and 2) the dialectic conflict agenda. In the war on terror agenda, the globalists were using the US to forcefully restructure the Middle East through invasions and color revolutions. And in the dialectic conflict agenda, they were building a counterbalance (the BRICS) to the US’ “increasingly insane unilateral actions.”

Putin’s support for both of these agendas was demonstrated after the Iraq invasion took place in 2003. Have a look at this article from 2004…
put2agenda
…From CNN

Reading this article, one might ask him/her self, “If the Russians were really opposed to the Iraq War, why would Putin reveal ‘intelligence’ that supports the position of those who started the War?” The answer is simple: because he was supporting both globalist agendas…

> As the article states, the Iraq War was facing domestic criticism, so Putin said what was needed to help fend off opposition to the war on terror agenda. Since the globalists still had several years worth of work to do in the Middle East, Putin had to help keep the operation on track.

> At the same time, he had to keep up the public stance of opposing the war so the dialectic conflict agenda could continue to develop. At the time the CNN article was written, there was still two years to go until the BRIC nations held their first unofficial meeting at the UN.

So by talking opposition from one side of his mouth and providing support from the other side of his mouth, Putin followed the globalist plan to a T.

A few years later, the East/West dialectic began to take material form. Here is something from the Kremlin website on “Cooperation within BRIC”…

>>> Political dialogue within the BRIC format began in New York in September 2006, when their foreign ministers conferred during the 61st UN General Assembly. Since then, the BRIC foreign ministers have met four times, including at a full-scale meeting in Yekaterinburg on May 16, 2008. The joint statement adopted as a result of the latter meeting formulated common approaches to crucial issues on the international agenda. <<<

So it was in the womb of the United Nations that Baron O’Neill’s BRIC spermatozoon found its target, and the BRIC alliance was born there nearly five years later. A full-scale meeting was held three years after that, which gave rise to a statement on their joint agenda in May of 2008. Before we examine that statement, though, we must have a look at what Putin said at the Munich Conference on Security Policy in February of 2007.

At the Conference, Putin unveiled the “world order dialectic” that we have become so familiar with over the past several years. This is from the transcript of his speech (which can also be watched on YouTube)

>>> what is happening in today’s world – and we just started to discuss this – is a tentative to introduce precisely this concept into international affairs, the concept of a unipolar world.

And with which results?

Unilateral and frequently illegitimate actions have not resolved any problems. Moreover, they have caused new human tragedies and created new centres of tension. Judge for yourselves: wars as well as local and regional conflicts have not diminished. Mr Teltschik mentioned this very gently. And no less people perish in these conflicts – even more are dying than before. Significantly more, significantly more!

Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force – military force – in international relations, force that is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.As a result we do not have sufficient strength to find a comprehensive solution to any one of these conflicts. Finding a political settlement also becomes impossible.

We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?

[In these paragraphs, Putin introduces the PROBLEM: a United States that is running wild in the world trying to impose a unilateral order. He also expresses the collective REACTION (“This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?”). Watch now as he promotes the SOLUTION: the BRIC alliance, multipolarity, and the UN…]

The combined GDP measured in purchasing power parity of countries such as India and China is already greater than that of the United States. And a similar calculation with the GDP of the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – surpasses the cumulative GDP of the EU. And according to experts this gap will only increase in the future.

There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centres of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity.

In connection with this the role of multilateral diplomacy is significantly increasing…

I am convinced that the only mechanism that can make decisions about using military force as a last resort is the Charter of the United Nations. And in connection with this, either I did not understand what our colleague, the Italian Defence Minister, just said or what he said was inexact. In any case, I understood that the use of force can only be legitimate when the decision is taken by NATO, the EU, or the UN. If he really does think so, then we have different points of view. Or I didn’t hear correctly. The use of force can only be considered legitimate if the decision is sanctioned by the UN. And we do not need to substitute NATO or the EU for the UN. When the UN will truly unite the forces of the international community and can really react to events in various countries, when we will leave behind this disdain for international law, then the situation will be able to change. <<<

So there you have it. The globalists are using the United States to do all the dirty work in restructuring the world for the UN-centered NWO, and they are laying all the blame for the damage on the US nation-state, not themselves or their UN. At the same time, they are building up the BRICS as heroes who will save the world from the “rampaging American unipower” by bringing about a STRONGER UN which “will truly unite the forces of the international community and can really react to events in various countries.”

As you can see, Putin is all about bringing in a United Nations that is able to dominate the nation-states of the world, including the US. And this is reflected also in the joint statement from the first full-scale BRIC meeting. If you read through the statement, you’ll realize very quickly that it’s all about the UN. Allow me to take you on a tour of the key points…

> According to the BRIC alliance, what kind of world order should we have?…

“The Ministers reiterated that today’s world order should be based on the rule of international laws and the strengthening of multilateralism with the United Nations playing the central role.”

  • One with the globalists’ UN playing the central role.

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do you make the UN stronger like Putin suggested at Munich?…

“They reaffirmed the need for a comprehensive reform of the UN with a view to making it more efficient so that it can deal with the current global challenges more effectively. The Ministers of Russia and China reiterated that their countries attach importance to the status of India and Brazil in international affairs, and understand and support India’s and Brazil’s aspirations to play a greater role in the United Nations.”

  • Translation: “Reform it by giving the rest of the BRIC nations permanent seats on the UNSecurity Council.”

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do we solve the world’s economic malaise?…

“The Ministers noted that sustainable development of global economy in the long-term as well as finding solutions to the acute global problems of our time, such as poverty, hunger and diseases are only possible if due account is taken of the interests of all nations and within a just global economic system…

The Ministers spoke in favour of intensifying the dialogue to achieve the internationally agreed development goals, primarily the Millennium Development Goals, on the basis of global partnership for development. They supported international efforts to combat hunger and poverty.”

  • By conforming to the UN’s Sustainable Development rules and reaching the UN’s Millennium Development Goals of course.

> According to the BRIC alliance, how do you end the scourge of terrorism?…

“The Ministers unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, committed for whatever purposes. They reiterated that terrorism constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security and that the international community should take necessary steps to enhance cooperation to prevent and combat terrorism. They particularly highlighted the importance of the UN cooperation framework and the need for all member states to implement international conventions of the United Nations and UN Security Council resolutions on fighting terrorism.

The Ministers emphasized the importance of the implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in all its aspects and expressed their opinion that all member states should make concerted efforts towards expeditious finalization of a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism at the UN.

  • So we end globalist organized and funded terrorism by fully complying with the globalistUN’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy. Why didn’t I think of that?!

> According to the BRIC alliance, is manmade climate change for real?…

“The Ministers spoke in favour of strengthening international cooperation to address climate changein the context of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. They expressed their desire to work closely together in order to carry out the Bali Action Plan.”

  • Yep, it’s real, and everyone needs to follow the UN plan to mitigate it.

It was after this joint BRIC statement was released that the Kremlin posted the “Cooperation within BRIC” statement, and the latter contains a passage that we also need to see…

“BRIC is a loose group of countries including Brazil, Russia, India and China, the largest economic growth and political influence centres among emerging economies. These countries have a substantial integration potential in their respective regions.

So what do the Russians mean by “substantial integration potential in their respective regions”? They are talking about a BRIC role in helping integrate the world’s nations into the United Nations Development Regions…
ungroupings

Take a moment to think about the continents of the world:

In North America, the globalists have the US to lead the UN integration effort;
in Western Europe, they have the EU to lead the integration.

Now let’s add the BRICS…

In Eurasia (the middle part of the Europe/Asia landmass), they have Russia to lead the integration;
in Asia, they have China and India to lead the integration;
in South America, they have Brazil to lead the integration;
in Africa, they have South Africa to lead the integration.

Can you see how the BRIC alliance helps pull the developing world into the UN’s regional system?

With all this laid before us, we see that Putin and his BRICS alliance are helping bring in a New World Order centered on a region-based United Nations. And in doing this, they are stopping the evil plans of the Western globalists, right?

Wrong.

The Western globalists’ plan for the New World Order has always called for it to be UN-centered and region-based. They published the blueprint for it back in 1961, and here are some excerpts from pages 35 and 26 (please pardon my crooked scanning)…
pfa35
nwovision26
UNNWO35

Can you guess from which book these excerpts were taken? It was this one…
prospectforamerica
…And it was the result of a Rockefeller-funded initiative called the Special Studies Project.

Can you guess who was the director of the Project? It was Vladimir Putin’s personal friend, Henry Kissinger…
kissputfriends
…From the New York Times

So Putin is helping implement the NWO his pal Henry Kissinger helped design back in 1956…
kissputie
…To learn more about this subject, read The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words…

Now that I’ve shown you what Putin and the BRICS are up to — using their own verifiable words — it’s time to state the obvious…

PUTIN’S CULT OF PERSONALITY AND THE BRICS ALLIANCE
ARE BOTH GLOBALIST FRONTS
PURPOSE-BUILT TO DRAW THE WORLD INTO THE NEW WORLD ORDER
BY CONVINCING THE PEOPLE THE EVIL WESTERN GLOBALISTS HAVE BEEN STOPPED
AND THE IMPERIALIST POWERS HAVE BEEN DEFEATED.

If this reality causes you to lose your false hope, good. False hope must be released in order to grasp on to true hope. And false solutions must be rejected in order to make way for real solutions.

[Part 3 – 29 November 2015]

VETERANS TODAY AND DIALECTIC PROPAGANDA

Now that we’ve explored what Putin and the BRICS are really about, it’s time to turn our attention back to the laughably absurd Veterans Today article that inspired this essay. As we look upon it, let’s make some observations, address some key points, and find a reason for hope.

POINT 1 — The first thing of note is the author, Preston James, who describes himself as aSocial Psychologist with “numerous” intel contacts.
prestonsp

If you wanted to mindfu*k a person – change his or her thoughts, feelings, and behaviors using social stimuli conveyed through mass media – whom would you employ? Why, a social psychologist of course. The controlled mainstream and alternative media are all staffed by such professional mindfu*kers. Their bios will show a background in psychology, intelligence, think tanks, and/or military psywar. Just have a look at who else sits on the Veterans Today Editorial Board of Directors
khrus

It’s important to realize that when you read Veterans Today, you are subjecting yourself to psywar. Their job is to mindfu*k you into accepting both the East/West geopolitical dialectic and the Christ/Antichrist spiritual dialectic.

POINT 2 — Take note of the fearful imagery…
horsemen
…and fearful words they use in the article…

>>> And these “most evil criminals in history” fully realize that in order to take over the whole World they will eventually need to establish their own centralized massive military forces and secret police power.

Most normal folks would define such crimes against humanity as raw tyranny and psychopathy beyond imagination.

And that is exactly what the system is that these Globalists are trying to engender, Worldwide Tyranny and their own 24/7 surveillance system coordinated together to produce what is best described as a virtual boot in the face of all humanity 24 hours a day, seven days a week withno end ever. [“with no end ever”: this sounds like hell, doesn’t it, and hell is the same concept they use to scare you in the Christ/Antichrist dialectic] <<<

Fear is a very powerful force within the human psyche, and it is the mind-killer. If they can keep you in fear and present you with a simple good guys vs. bad guys fairy tale that requires no thought, they are doing your thinking for you. You can no longer afford to allow that. Here is something I previously wrote about their use of fear in the East/West dialectic…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>> 1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?

> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).

> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) is where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap. <<<END EXCERPT

As you read the Veterans Today article, note how it serves to scare people away from the West and towards Putin (and the stronger UN he will bring in). Can you see how the rampaging Western horsemen in the picture would scare rabbits towards the BRICS trap?

POINT 3 — Take note of the references to BABYLON and LUCIFER in the article. This is part of the Christ/Antichrist spiritual dialectic the globalists are also trying to sell the awakening public. If you look at some of the author’s previous work on the “Secret Space War”…
jamesaliens
…you’ll begin to see that the…

“bad unilateral NWO” vs. “good multilateral NWO” conflict
is supposedly part of a larger
“bad aliens” vs. “good aliens” conflict.

Before you write the guy off as a nutter, though, it’s important to note that it was none other than the Rockefellers who launched the UFO Disclosure Movement (see Why are the Rockefellers and the Jesuits guiding the UFO Disclosure Movement?), and the Vatican has been talking about aliens as well (see The Vatican is preparing to introduce the Anunnaki to us). As insane as it all might sound, this ET stuff actually appears to be a real part of their agenda. And if you read the article, you get a basic idea of the two sides they are presenting to the public:

The “Bad Aliens” – “…subterranean Reptoids who are luciferians, evil to the core and allegedly working very hard to set up a Globalist NWO system using the ‘mystery Babylon religion’…”

The “Good Aliens” – “the so-called actual invading aliens from outer space in the final battle will turn out to be God’s army against the aliens (Dracos or Reptoids) which come up from underground to fight at the battle of Armageddon.”

So the Antichrist side is the US, the West, and the Luciferian lizards, and the Christ side is Russia, the BRICS, and the angel army from outer space. Sounds like an Ed Wood movie…
edwood
…does it not? But the globalists might actually try to put on such a show. If you are interested in delving into this particular rabbit hole, I recommend you read Obama and the 2nd Coming. It’s a good primer on what to expect.

And now we find a reason for real hope…

Point 4 – Note that the article attempts to address the growing awareness of Putin’s dialectic role…

>>> The Russian Federation under President Putin’s leadership seems to be a major exception to this apparent Worldwide Globalist control matrix.

Some fear Russia is just playing an assigned dialectical role and not really against the NWO System that these Globalists are trying to shove in place. <<<

The fact that they even mentioned this tells us the War of the Narrative is turning against them. If their “Putin as hero” fairy tale were holding up, they would make no mention of the dialectic out of fear of drawing attention to it. They brought it up because they had to bring it up — they had to do something to combat it.

They even went so far as to slightly distance themselves from Putin in an effort to feign reasonability and open-mindedness…

>>> Until President Putin releases all this Intel to the Russian Mass Media and to the Alternative Media on the Internet, we must reserve judgment as to his true motives despite how promising they now appear. <<<

Of course, this distancing is just for show. They have always been tireless promoters of Putin’s cult of personality…
putfeargod
…(Link)

The article also offers a way for Putin to prove he’s really a hero and not a dialectic roleplayer…

>>> Now is the time for Putin and the Russian Federation to clearly show it true hand if it is legitimate in its fight against the Globalists by doing a big public Intel dump. <<<

Given that Putin’s good guy role in the dialectic is to…

1) block the West (like he’s doing in Syria),
2) EXPOSE the West (like he did with the Turks), and
3) ultimately defeat the West,

…what the article suggests is essentially this…

“Please, Mr. Putin, prove you’re not a dialectic roleplayer by doing exactly what the dialectic calls for you to do.”

How ridiculous is that?

And therein lies our hope: they are losing control of the narrative. This might seem like a small thing right now, but the complications this unleashes on the globalists will grow over time.

Love always…

[Addendum 1 – 29 November 2015]

PUTIN VS. THE WEST AT THE CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT

With the Paris Climate Change Summit just hours away, it’s time to look back to the G20 Summit that happened earlier this month. Here is an excerpt from Update 87

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

[Addendum 10 – 16 November 2015] – East versus West on Climate Change

According to a Bloomberg Business article titled As Terrorism Unites G-20, Climate ChangeExposes Divisions

>>> The divide at the G-20 initially emerged over whether countries will back a more “differentiated” approach, where developed nations carry an extra burden, or “shared” emissions responsibilities, which would require developing nations to make bigger cuts, according to officials who asked not to be named…

The BRICS nations called for a greater focus on emissions pledges to be “differentiated” based upon national circumstances, suggesting they favor industrialized nations doing more to limit emissions than developing ones. <<<

This last paragraph is in keeping with Putin’s reported skepticism on manmade climate change:Putin Believes Global Warming ‘Is A Fraud To Restrain Developing Nations’. So this argument over “differentiated” measures versus “shared” measures might end up being the reason cited for Putin’s potential blocking of a climate deal at the upcoming summit.

In addendum 3 of this update I asked, “What kind of show will they put on, a cooperative love-in or a breakdown between West and East?” Looking at the back-and-forth over Syria and Climate Change, it appears that this G20 Summit is being used to demonstrate the (phony) conflict between the West and East. Should the BRICS be seen as frustrating the West on both Syria and Climate Change, it will set the stage for more provocative actions by the “insane West.”

<<<END EXCERPT

Given the recent shoot-down of the Russian warplane in Syria, we can expect Putin to put on a big show of being tough on the West in the climate negotiations. This will likely result in one of two outcomes:

1) The BRICS will force the West to accept “differentiated” carbon-cutting responsibilities in order to get a deal.

2) A unanimous deal will not be reached, and Putin will be cast as the one who blocked it.

Either way, the globalist script will probably call for the evil West to punish Putin, so be on the lookout for “terrorist attacks” in Russia at some point after the Summit ends (and probably before the end of the year).